diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/108/other/1828429')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/108/other/1828429 | 38 |
1 files changed, 38 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/108/other/1828429 b/results/classifier/108/other/1828429 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..dcf52b56 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/108/other/1828429 @@ -0,0 +1,38 @@ +graphic: 0.768 +semantic: 0.659 +network: 0.571 +device: 0.523 +socket: 0.363 +performance: 0.296 +vnc: 0.230 +PID: 0.213 +boot: 0.199 +files: 0.189 +other: 0.189 +permissions: 0.172 +debug: 0.149 +KVM: 0.048 + +qemu-system-aarch64 crashes with assertion failed while running GCC 9 test suite + +I am using QEMU 4.0.0 on an x86_64 Linux 4.19.0 host, the guest is an Aarch64 linux 5.0.0 system. The same issue occurred on QEMU 3.1.0. + +While running the GCC 9.1 test suite on the guest system, QEMU crashes with: + +qemu-system-aarch64: [...]/qemu-4.0.0/tcg/tcg.c:3952: tcg_gen_code: Assertion `s->gen_insn_end_off[num_insns] == off' failed. + +I am able to reproduce the issue reliably, which is encouraging. The full QEMU command line is: + +qemu-system-aarch64 -kernel kernel-5.0.0cbl1 -append "root=/dev/vda1 ro init=/sbin/init console=ttyAMA0" -name guest=cbl -drive file=cbl.qcow2,index=0,media=disk,format=qcow2 -drive file=swap.qcow2,index=1,media=disk,format=qcow2 -machine virt -cpu cortex-a57 -smp 4,sockets=1,cores=2,threads=2 -m size=8192 -netdev tap,id=network0,ifname=tapcbl2,script=no,downscript=no -device virtio-net-device,netdev=network0,mac=aa:bb:cc:dd:ee:02 -nographic + +The specific GCC test that causes QEMU to crash is vldX.c run from advsimd-intrinsics.exp; I can reproduce via "make check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS=advsimd-intrinsics.exp=vldX.c" + +If there is anything I can do to further triage the issue, or gain more insight into what is going on, please let me know! I am eager to help however I can. + +Hi -- this looks rather like bug #1824853, which exists in QEMU 4.0 but which we have fixed in git. Could you try with a build of QEMU from current head-of-git to confirm that it's fixed there ? + + +I'm on it. Will follow up when I have a result. + +Confirmed, this is a duplicate of 1824853 and is resolved in 68a7b9724fe80bedb85060bde605213ce3f9baec. + |