1 files changed, 54 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/111/review/1196145 b/results/classifier/111/review/1196145
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..0eeb8a8c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/111/review/1196145
@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
+semantic: 0.212
+other: 0.197
+device: 0.153
+graphic: 0.068
+debug: 0.053
+PID: 0.045
+performance: 0.043
+files: 0.041
+network: 0.040
+permissions: 0.040
+socket: 0.031
+vnc: 0.030
+boot: 0.027
+KVM: 0.020
+debug: 0.492
+device: 0.128
+other: 0.101
+files: 0.072
+PID: 0.058
+semantic: 0.034
+performance: 0.025
+network: 0.021
+boot: 0.016
+graphic: 0.016
+permissions: 0.012
+socket: 0.012
+vnc: 0.008
+KVM: 0.005
+
+usb-host: hostaddr=0XX is parsed as octal number
+
+when doing
+
+device_add usb-host,hostaddr=010
+
+taking 010 in the format of both lsusb or udev, qemu parses an octal number and assumes hostaddr=8.
+(i used a 2.0 device on the ehci.0 bus)
+at least to me that is confusing.
+
+also:
+
+when adding a non-existent usb device (bogus hostaddr), the following is created according to 'usb info':
+
+  Device 1.0, Port 1, Speed 1.5 Mb/s, Product USB Host Device
+
+in usb_qdev_init():
+usb_claim_port is called but usb_device_init does not report an error and thus usb_release_port is not called.
+
+ps: when using host-libusb.c and tested on 1.5.1.tgz
+
+Looking through old bug tickets... is this still an issue with the latest version of QEMU? Or could we close this ticket nowadays?
+
+[Expired for QEMU because there has been no activity for 60 days.]
+