diff options
Diffstat (limited to '')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/118/all/1637974 | 114 |
1 files changed, 114 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/118/all/1637974 b/results/classifier/118/all/1637974 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..25e737f8 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/118/all/1637974 @@ -0,0 +1,114 @@ +architecture: 0.940 +device: 0.940 +arm: 0.937 +permissions: 0.936 +assembly: 0.936 +virtual: 0.935 +user-level: 0.932 +register: 0.930 +semantic: 0.928 +PID: 0.923 +graphic: 0.916 +files: 0.912 +ppc: 0.906 +TCG: 0.904 +mistranslation: 0.888 +network: 0.887 +hypervisor: 0.885 +peripherals: 0.884 +performance: 0.881 +vnc: 0.871 +KVM: 0.870 +risc-v: 0.868 +boot: 0.852 +debug: 0.849 +VMM: 0.847 +kernel: 0.837 +socket: 0.809 +x86: 0.793 +i386: 0.682 + +dead code in pl080 functions + +pl080 is arm dma controller virtual device. +source code path: hw/dma/pl080.c +I find there are two same dead code in pl080_read and pl080_write, +Here's the code, comments are my opinion: +========================= +240 static uint64_t pl080_read(void *opaque, hwaddr offset, +241 unsigned size) +242 { +243 PL080State *s = (PL080State *)opaque; +244 uint32_t i; +245 uint32_t mask; +246 +247 if (offset >= 0xfe0 && offset < 0x1000) { +248 if (s->nchannels == 8) { +249 return pl080_id[(offset - 0xfe0) >> 2]; +250 } else { +251 return pl081_id[(offset - 0xfe0) >> 2]; +252 } +253 } +254 if (offset >= 0x100 && offset < 0x200) { //// here offset is limited in 0x100~0x200 +255 i = (offset & 0xe0) >> 5; +256 if (i >= s->nchannels) +257 goto bad_offset; +258 switch (offset >> 2) { //// then here, offset>>2 is in range 64~128 +259 case 0: /* SrcAddr */ //// while the switch case is 0,1,2,3,4, +260 return s->chan[i].src; //// so, NONE of the switch case would be selected ! +261 case 1: /* DestAddr */ //// this switch is A DEAD CODE, it is contradictory with if. +262 return s->chan[i].dest; +263 case 2: /* LLI */ +264 return s->chan[i].lli; +265 case 3: /* Control */ +266 return s->chan[i].ctrl; +267 case 4: /* Configuration */ +268 return s->chan[i].conf; +269 default: +270 goto bad_offset; +271 } +272 } + ..................................... +============================================= + +I guess, switch statement should like this : +switch((offset-0x100)>>2) +{ +... +} + +On 31 October 2016 at 10:48, jeyyej <email address hidden> wrote: +> Public bug reported: +> +> pl080 is arm dma controller virtual device. +> source code path: hw/dma/pl080.c +> I find there are two same dead code in pl080_read and pl080_write, + +> + if this DEADCODE is not the author's original purpose, +> + Then there must be something in logic goes wrong, pl080 have NEVER works correctly ? + +Yes, this code is incorrect. However the only registers +affected are those that set up the DMA channels, and +the code for actually doing DMA transfers will assert if +the guest ever tries to use it (see the hw_error() call in +pl080_run()), so even if the guest could set up the DMA +channels it would run into problems later. + +This device is only used in the versatilepb board, and +I don't think Linux attempts to use it for DMA, so nobody's +ever needed to care that it's actually totally broken +for anything beyond "shouldn't crash the kernel when it +tries to probe for and initialize it". + +thanks +-- PMM + + +@Peter Maydell Oh, I see, but would you try to fix this code ? + +I have no requirement for a working pl080, since I have no guest code that requires one. If somebody else (you?) wants to send a patch that fixes it, I'm happy to review it. + + +Fixed here: +https://git.qemu.org/?p=qemu.git;a=commitdiff;h=156448ab640baaeca18 + |