1 files changed, 69 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/118/none/891625 b/results/classifier/118/none/891625
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..32aafa8f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/118/none/891625
@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
+mistranslation: 0.659
+device: 0.644
+graphic: 0.570
+semantic: 0.567
+user-level: 0.523
+virtual: 0.473
+PID: 0.445
+ppc: 0.444
+files: 0.441
+network: 0.438
+permissions: 0.419
+architecture: 0.413
+register: 0.412
+KVM: 0.392
+performance: 0.382
+debug: 0.375
+socket: 0.375
+arm: 0.333
+risc-v: 0.330
+TCG: 0.325
+VMM: 0.319
+vnc: 0.312
+boot: 0.306
+i386: 0.303
+peripherals: 0.303
+hypervisor: 0.296
+assembly: 0.289
+x86: 0.278
+kernel: 0.253
+
+[qemu-kvm] add vhost-net to kvm group udev rules 65-kvm.rules
+
+Please consider authorizing the kvm group to access vhost-net device, similar to the kvm device.
+Thanks!
+
+
+
+I wonder if it really belongs to kvm group, -- maybe a separate "vhost_net" group should be used instead.  Yes it can only be used with qemu/kvm currently, but maybe some other tool will use it in the future, and looking at how many security issues /dev/kvm access had, maybe vhost_net shold be restricted more...
+
+How other distributions are doing this?  I'm not sure we want to introduce our own naming here...
+
+Well, at Gentoo we have kvm group, and I think that this comes from
+upstream rule.
+Doing vhost_net is good, anything that may be assigned to regular users.
+Thanks!
+
+
+Since there is no udev file in upstream QEMU, I guess this bug was meant for the qemu Ubuntu package instead?
+
+The attachment "udef.diff" seems to be a patch.  If it isn't, please remove the "patch" flag from the attachment, remove the "patch" tag, and if you are a member of the ~ubuntu-reviewers, unsubscribe the team.
+
+[This is an automated message performed by a Launchpad user owned by ~brian-murray, for any issues please contact him.]
+
+Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better.
+
+I'm not sure if it would be appropriate to make this change, but it is clear what you're requesting so I'm setting the bug status to Triaged.
+
+Hi,
+I'm currently parsing through bug that are dormant way too long.
+
+These days the content still exists, but is in debian/qemu-system-common.udev
+
+But vhost-net is working fine without that change, so I wonder what it was back then that failed without that - so that we can verify if that actually is an issue today.
+
+Until then setting incomplete.
+
+
+[Expired for qemu (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60 days.]
+