summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/debug/1031920
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/debug/1031920')
-rw-r--r--results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/debug/103192017
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/debug/1031920 b/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/debug/1031920
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..c609a699
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/debug/1031920
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let me try to figure out how to classify this bug report. The user provided a detailed report about an issue with the Linux user gdbserver in QEMU not responding to remote Ctrl-C interrupts. They also mentioned that they're working on a fix involving adding a new thread to handle communication after resuming the process.
+
+First, I'll read through the bug description carefully. The main problem is that when using GDB to debug a program running under QEMU, pressing Ctrl-C (which sends an interrupt) doesn't stop the program. Instead, it just gives up and stops debugging. This suggests that the communication between GDB and QEMU's gdbserver isn't working as expected after resuming execution.
+
+The user explains that once the process is resumed with "cont", the gdbstub in QEMU no longer reads the communication channel. So, any incoming interrupts from GDB are ignored because the server isn't listening anymore. They're planning to fix this by introducing an additional thread that will wake up when the process resumes and then monitor the communication channel for Ctrl-C requests.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, other.
+
+The issue here is related to how GDB communicates with QEMU's gdbserver. Since it's about the interaction between GDB and QEMU's debugging stub, this seems to fall under the "debug" category. The problem isn't in translation from source architecture or assembly lowering but rather in the communication handling during debugging sessions.
+
+I also note that the user mentioned another related issue with multithreaded breakpoints not suspending all threads, which further points towards a debugging environment problem, reinforcing that "debug" is the appropriate category.
+
+Therefore, I classify this bug report under the "debug" category.
+</think>
+
+debug
\ No newline at end of file