diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/mistranslation/1847467')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/mistranslation/1847467 | 19 |
1 files changed, 19 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/mistranslation/1847467 b/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/mistranslation/1847467 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..2cecec00 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/mistranslation/1847467 @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +<think> +Alright, I'm trying to classify this bug report for QEMU. The user provided a detailed description of an issue they're encountering with QEMU's x86_64 version. Let me go through it step by step. + +First, the title mentions "qemu-x86_64 segment prefixes error." That immediately makes me think about how QEMU handles segment registers when emulating x86_64 code. In 64-bit mode, certain segments like DS, ES, SS, and CS are supposed to be ignored according to the bug report. However, QEMU isn't ignoring them as it should. + +The user provided an example where instructions are preceded by FS and DS prefixes (0x64 and 0x26). They explain that in this case, the linear address is being mapped using DS instead of FS. The expected behavior is that these segment prefixes should be ignored in 64-bit mode, so only FS would affect the mapping with its base. + +They also included a small C++ program to demonstrate the issue. When run directly, it outputs "I'm not in QEMU," but when executed under QEMU, it says "I'm in QEMU." This suggests that without proper handling of the segment prefixes, the program behaves differently inside QEMU than outside. + +Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and other. + +The issue is related to how segment prefixes are handled in x86_64 mode. Since this involves the translation of instructions and the mapping of addresses, it's likely a problem with how QEMU translates x86_64 code into its internal representation or machine code. + +Segmentation is part of the CPU's addressing mode, so any error here would affect the semantic mapping from the source architecture (x86_64) to the target (which could be another architecture or the same one in an emulator). This seems like it would fall under "mistranslation" because QEMU isn't correctly handling the segment prefixes as they should be ignored, leading to incorrect memory addressing. + +I don't think it's related to assembly lowering because that term usually refers to optimizing code during compilation. The other categories seem less relevant here. It's not a device, graphic, or network issue; it's purely about how QEMU handles CPU instructions and their prefixes in 64-bit mode. +</think> + +mistranslation \ No newline at end of file |