summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/network/1228285
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/network/1228285')
-rw-r--r--results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/network/122828517
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 17 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/network/1228285 b/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/network/1228285
deleted file mode 100644
index 10b6de22..00000000
--- a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/network/1228285
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,17 +0,0 @@
-<think>
-Alright, so I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report regarding the e1000 NIC's TCP performance in QEMU. The user mentioned that when using the e1000 model with socket connections over TCP, they're experiencing very low bandwidth—about 30-50 Mb/sec. However, when switching to UDP, the performance jumps to around 1 Gb/sec or 950 Mb/sec, which is much better.
-
-First, I'll look at the provided categories to see where this might fit: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. 
-
-The issue revolves around network performance specifically with the e1000 NIC model in QEMU when using TCP sockets. The user noticed that this problem doesn't occur with other NIC models like rtl8139 or virtio, which suggests it's specific to how e1000 is handled.
-
-I know that e1000 is a network interface card model within QEMU, so the bug likely relates to the network handling. Since the issue affects TCP but not UDP, it could be related to how the NIC handles different protocols or congestion control mechanisms in TCP.
-
-Looking at the categories again: "network" seems directly relevant because this is about network performance issues. The other possible category might be "performance," but since it's specifically a network-related performance problem, "network" seems more precise.
-
-I don't think it falls under mistranslation or assembly lowering because those are lower-level code generation issues, not specific to network handling. Similarly, socket is part of the networking stack, but in this context, the problem isn't with the socket implementation itself but with how the e1000 NIC interacts with sockets over TCP.
-
-Therefore, classifying it under "network" makes the most sense as it directly relates to the network performance anomaly observed.
-</think>
-
-network
\ No newline at end of file