1 files changed, 13 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1062201 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1062201
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..caec0f08
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1062201
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I need to classify the given bug report into one of the provided categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+Looking at the bug report, the user is trying to start a QEMU VM using kvm-spice but it fails and dumps a core. The error message mentions "kvm-spice: ... register_subpage: Assertion failed." This suggests an issue within the KVM component or possibly with spice, which is used for remote desktop access.
+
+The error occurs in exec.c at line 2641, which is part of QEMU's code. Since the problem arises when using kvm-spice and not when using /usr/bin/kvm directly, it points towards an interaction issue between KVM and SPICE. The failure is during the initialization phase of spice, possibly due to a misconfiguration or a bug in how resources are being managed by the hypervisor.
+
+The categories related here could be 'hypervisor' since KVM is a hypervisor component, but the error seems more specific to the interaction between QEMU and SPICE. However, given that the main issue is with starting the VM through KVM and spice, the primary category would likely be 'KVM'. Alternatively, if it's an issue within the spice driver or interface handling, it might fall under 'other' since it doesn't neatly fit into the other categories provided.
+
+But considering the error message comes from QEMU's code during the execution phase, especially in a part related to memory management (subpage registration), and given that KVM is involved, I think the most appropriate category is 'hypervisor'.
+</think>
+
+KVM
\ No newline at end of file