diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/boot/1586229')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/boot/1586229 | 19 |
1 files changed, 19 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/boot/1586229 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/boot/1586229 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..fff20735 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/boot/1586229 @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories for QEMU. Let me start by reading through the report carefully. + +The user mentions "seabios hell," which suggests they're having trouble with SEABIOS in QEMU. They talk about how the BIOS loads after the hard drive wants to boot, which is unusual because typically the BIOS should load before the OS. They also mention issues with booting Yosemite and problems when trying to access the BIOS setup. It seems like the BIOS isn't appearing correctly or at the right time. + +Looking at their description, they're struggling to get into the BIOS setup (they found it by mistake). They tried mashing keys but couldn't get it to work as expected. The BIOS only loads when booting a hard disk, which might indicate that QEMU is not properly emulating the BIOS behavior or there's an issue with how SEABIOS is integrated. + +The user also mentions that changing anything in the BIOS setup affects their ability to boot from a CD, implying that there's some misconfiguration or bug in how SEABIOS handles different boot sources. They're experiencing a black screen when trying to boot, which they believe relates to SEABIOS and not the VGA driver, so it's more about the firmware than hardware drivers. + +Considering the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +The issue is primarily with how SEABIOS is functioning in QEMU. Since SEABIOS is related to the BIOS setup and booting process, the problem seems to be more about the boot ROM or firmware handling rather than direct device emulation or graphics. However, none of the categories directly mention BIOS specifically. + +Looking at the options again: "boot" category makes sense because the user's main issue is with the boot process—how SEABIOS loads and how it interacts with the booting hardware. The problem isn't about performance, network issues, or graphical drivers; it's about the BIOS not behaving correctly during the boot sequence. + +So, I think the correct classification here is "boot" because the user's issue revolves around the BIOS loading incorrectly and affecting the boot process. +</think> + +boot \ No newline at end of file |