diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/2755')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/2755 | 34 |
1 files changed, 34 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/2755 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/2755 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..c756f618 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/2755 @@ -0,0 +1,34 @@ +<think> +Okay, I need to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of the given categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +The issue described is about shrinking an attached RBD (RADOS Block Device) size. The user followed steps to attach a disk, write data, then use block_resize to shrink it to 1GiB. This caused the virtual disk to resize successfully but led to data loss. + +Looking at the categories: + +- Mistranslation: Doesn't seem related since it's not about incorrect semantic mapping in translation. +- Assembly or other: Not directly related as this is a higher-level operation, not assembly code issues. +- Device: Maybe, since RBD is a block device. But I'm considering if there's a more specific category. +- Kernel: Could be, but the problem seems to be with QEMU's handling of resizing rather than the kernel itself. +- Peripherals: Perhaps, as it relates to disk devices attached to the VM. +- Hypervisor: Since QEMU can act as a hypervisor when using KVM. + +Wait, shrinking an RBD is related to block device management. The problem arises during resizing, which could be under the "device" category, but also possibly "hypervisor" if it's about how the hypervisor manages the devices. + +But in this case, since the issue is specifically with resizing a block device (RBD) attached to a VM, and the result is data loss upon resize, it likely falls under "device". Alternatively, if it's related to how QEMU handles storage for VMs, maybe "hypervisor" could be applicable. + +However, considering that RBD is a storage backend, the issue is more about block device management within the hypervisor. Therefore, I think "hypervisor" might be the correct category. But wait, "peripherals" also relates to devices attached to the VM, like disks. + +Wait again, but "hypervisor" would cover how the hypervisor handles the storage devices and their resizing. So maybe "hypervisor" is more accurate. Alternatively, if it's about block level operations within QEMU when acting as a device for the VM, perhaps "device" is better. + +Alternatively, looking at the categories: there are specific ones like "network", "socket", etc., but none directly mention storage except maybe "files". But file resizing isn't exactly the same as disk resizing. Wait, "files" might not be it because this is about block devices, not files in a filesystem. + +Wait, perhaps the issue is that when shrinking an RBD (which is a block device), data loss occurs. This suggests that QEMU isn't handling the resize correctly, leading to data corruption or loss. That could fall under "hypervisor" since it's part of managing virtual machine storage by the hypervisor. + +Alternatively, maybe it's a bug in how QEMU interacts with RBD, which is more about device management. But I'm not sure if there's a better category than "hypervisor". + +Wait, looking back at the categories: hypervisor is an option. So perhaps this bug is related to how the hypervisor (QEMU) handles resizing of virtual disks attached via RBD. + +Therefore, after considering all options, the most appropriate category would be "hypervisor". +</think> + +hypervisor \ No newline at end of file |