diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/boot/627')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/boot/627 | 23 |
1 files changed, 23 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/boot/627 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/boot/627 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..9c2bd6f5 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/boot/627 @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +<think> +Alright, so I'm trying to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of the given categories. Let me read through the information carefully. + +The user mentioned that VI.EXE crashes on start under QEMU but works fine in BOCHS. The description says it hangs immediately upon startup. They provided steps to reproduce and attached the vi.exe file, noting it's an old program. + +Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +I need to figure out which category best fits this issue. Since VI.EXE is crashing under QEMU but works in BOCHS, it's likely related to how QEMU emulates the environment compared to BOCHS. BOCHS and QEMU are both emulators, but they might handle certain aspects differently. + +VI.EXE is an old program, so perhaps there's a difference in how QEMU handles some DOS or legacy software compared to BOCHS. The crash happens immediately when starting VI.EXE, which suggests it might be related to the boot process or how certain system calls are emulated under QEMU. + +Considering the categories, 'boot' seems relevant because if the program isn't running correctly after startup, it could be an issue with the emulation during the boot phase. Alternatively, 'mistranslation' could be a possibility if there's incorrect mapping of source architecture to target IR, but without more specific details on that, I'm not sure. + +Other possibilities like 'network' or 'socket' don't seem directly related since VI.EXE is a text editor and doesn't require network sockets. Similarly, graphics issues would relate to display problems, which aren't mentioned here. + +So, the most likely category is 'boot' because it's about the program not starting correctly under QEMU, indicating an issue with how the system initializes or handles certain instructions during the boot process. +</think> + +The bug report describes VI.EXE crashing on startup in QEMU but working in BOCHS. Since VI.EXE hangs immediately upon startup, this suggests an issue during the program's initialization phase. Given that the crash occurs at startup, it is likely related to how the system emulates certain hardware or processes during the boot sequence. Among the provided categories, 'boot' best fits because the problem arises when the program starts running, which relates to the boot process in the emulator. + +**Answer:** + +boot \ No newline at end of file |