diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/manual-review/2859')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/manual-review/2859 | 24 |
1 files changed, 24 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/manual-review/2859 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/manual-review/2859 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..e332735e --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/manual-review/2859 @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ +<think> +Alright, so I need to classify this bug report: "QEMU Command Not Working." Let's break it down. + +First, QEMU is a versatile machine emulator and virtualization tool. It supports various functionalities like emulation of different hardware architectures, networking, graphics, etc. The possible categories given are quite broad but cover most aspects of QEMU. + +The bug report mentions that a "QEMU Command" isn't working. Since it's referring to a command, it's likely related to how the user interacts with QEMU via its command-line interface or through configuration files. Now, looking at the categories: + +- Mistranslation: This usually relates to incorrect mapping of source architecture to IR/target in user-mode assembly, which doesn't seem to fit here. +- Assembly lowering: Again, more about compiler or translation issues, not directly related to commands. +- Other: A catch-all category, but maybe there's a better fit. +- Device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +The command could be related to any of these areas. For example, if the command is about networking setup, it would fall under "network." If it's about graphical output, then "graphic." But without more specifics, it's tricky. + +However, considering that a command not working could involve misconfiguration or an issue with how QEMU processes commands in general, maybe "other" is safer. Alternatively, if the command relates to device emulation, perhaps "device." + +But given the options and the nature of the report, I think "other" might be too vague. Maybe it's more about the command-line interface itself, which isn't explicitly listed but could fall under "other." Alternatively, if it's a boot issue with commands, then "boot." But since the user just mentioned the command not working without specifics, I'll go with "other." +</think> + +The bug report is classified as: + +**other** + +(Reasoning: The report mentions a QEMU command not working but doesn't specify which component or subsystem. Without more details, it falls under the general category.) \ No newline at end of file |