summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/other/1844814
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/other/1844814')
-rw-r--r--results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/other/184481424
1 files changed, 24 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/other/1844814 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/other/1844814
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..27593637
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/other/1844814
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I'm trying to classify this bug report related to QEMU. The issue is about the SystemTap documentation being out of date. From what I understand, the problem arises because a specific command in the documentation no longer works after a certain commit.
+
+Looking at the provided information, the user ran a script using `tracetool.py` with parameters like `--backends=dtrace`, `--format=stap`, and others. They encountered an error: "Error: group name is required." This suggests that the command expects a group name argument which isn't being provided in the current usage.
+
+The commit mentioned, 2098c56a9bc, moved the setting of the group name into Makefiles. So, the way the trace tool is invoked must have changed as a result. The old documentation didn't include specifying the group name, leading to the error when following those steps post-commit.
+
+Now, considering the categories: there's no mention of issues related to translation, assembly, or performance here. It seems more about how the tracing tool is being used and the configuration after a code change. Since it's related to documentation and tool usage rather than specific components like network, graphic, or hypervisor, I think "other" might be the appropriate category.
+
+Wait, but perhaps it falls under "trace"? However, looking back at the list of categories provided, there isn't one explicitly named "trace." The closest is maybe under "debug," as tracing tools are often used for debugging purposes. Alternatively, if none of the specific categories fit, then "other" would be correct.
+
+But wait, in the given options, I don't see a "trace" category listed. Let me check again: the possible categories are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+Since the issue is about outdated documentation leading to an error when using a tool related to tracing, which is part of debugging features. So "debug" might be a suitable category. Alternatively, if it's more about how the tool is run and the setup in Makefiles, perhaps it's more of an "other" issue.
+
+But wait, another angle: the commit moved group name handling into Makefiles, implying that when building or configuring QEMU via Makefiles, this is set up correctly. The documentation didn't get updated to reflect this change, so users trying to use the old method are facing issues. Since it's about incorrect documentation leading to a usage error, maybe "other" is still better.
+
+Alternatively, since it's related to how the tool is executed and requires additional parameters now, perhaps "debug" as it pertains to debugging features not working as expected. But without an explicit "trace" category, I'm leaning towards "other."
+</think>
+
+The bug report relates to outdated documentation causing a command-line error when using the tracing tool. This isn't directly tied to any specific component like network or hypervisor but rather a documentation issue affecting tool usage.
+
+**Answer:**
+other
\ No newline at end of file