diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/other/2107')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/other/2107 | 19 |
1 files changed, 19 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/other/2107 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/other/2107 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..c79d75e3 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/other/2107 @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +<think> +Alright, so I'm trying to classify this bug report for QEMU. The bug says that target/riscv: zve32x/zve64x are not supported. Hmm, okay, let's break this down. + +First off, RISC-V is an instruction set architecture. ZVE32X and ZVE64X refer to the vector extensions for RISC-V. These extensions add support for vector operations, which are crucial for performance in tasks like machine learning or scientific computing. So if these aren't supported in QEMU, that's a problem. + +Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. I need to pick the right one. + +Well, this isn't about user-mode translation (mistranslation) or converting assembly code (assembly lowering). It's also not related to devices like GPUs (graphic), network interfaces (network), or things like VNC or KVM which are more about virtualization and hardware acceleration. + +Wait, but RISC-V is an architecture that QEMU would emulate. Since it's specifically talking about vector extensions not being supported, which affects the performance of certain operations. However, the broader category might be 'other' because it doesn't fit into the specific categories listed except perhaps 'hypervisor' if we consider QEMU as a hypervisor for RISC-V. + +But I think more accurately, since the bug is about missing support for specific vector extensions in RISC-V, which is part of the target architecture's feature set. It might fall under 'other' because it's not directly tied to user-mode issues or hardware devices but rather a missing functionality in QEMU's emulation capabilities. + +Alternatively, considering that these vector extensions are part of the CPU features, maybe 'peripherals' isn't right. Perhaps 'performance' could be relevant, but the bug is more about lack of support than performance issues. So I think 'other' is the safest bet here. +</think> + +The bug report indicates missing support for specific RISC-V vector extensions in QEMU. Since this relates to a feature not being implemented rather than fitting into other categories, it's best classified as: + +other \ No newline at end of file |