summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/peripherals/942
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/peripherals/942')
-rw-r--r--results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/peripherals/94215
1 files changed, 15 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/peripherals/942 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/peripherals/942
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..334c6017
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/peripherals/942
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I need to classify this bug report: "No TPM support for riscv64 in QEMU". The possible categories are listed, and I should choose just one word from them.
+
+First, let's understand the bug. The user is reporting that there's no support for the Trusted Platform Module (TPM) when using RISC-V 64-bit architecture in QEMU. TPMs are hardware components used for security functions like encryption.
+
+Looking at the categories: Mistranslation, Assembly Lowering, Device, Graphic, Socket, Network, KVM, Boot, VNC, Debug, Files, Permissions, Performance, Kernel, Peripherals, Hypervisor, and Other.
+
+TPMs are typically peripherals because they're hardware devices that provide specific functionalities. In QEMU, peripherals are usually emulated or connected via device models. So the lack of TPM support would fall under a missing peripheral feature.
+
+Other categories don't seem to fit as well. It's not about translation issues (mistranslation), nor is it related to networking, sockets, etc. Since it's about hardware support for a specific device, "peripherals" makes sense.
+</think>
+
+The bug report concerns the absence of TPM support for RISC-V 64-bit in QEMU. Since TPMs are considered peripherals in this context, the category is:
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file