diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/hypervisor/664')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/hypervisor/664 | 19 |
1 files changed, 19 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/hypervisor/664 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/hypervisor/664 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..e48ebe5b --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/hypervisor/664 @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +<think> +Alright, let me try to figure out how to classify this bug report. The user provided a detailed description about QEMU with hvf acceleration having an issue where it incorrectly reports the virtual address bit width via CPUID. + +First, I'll read through the problem description again. The main issue is that when running qemu-system-x86_64 with HVF acceleration enabled, the maximum extended CPUID function (EAX=0x80000000) returns 0x80000001. According to Intel's manual, this suggests that the virtual address bit width isn't being reported correctly because the CPU doesn't support the EAX=0x80000008 function. However, in reality, QEMU supports up to 48-bit virtual addresses. + +The user also provided steps to reproduce, mentioning dmesg logs where the kernel reports virtual address bit width as 32 instead of the expected 48. They suggest that exposing the 0x80000008 CPUID function and reporting real values would fix the issue. + +Now, looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +The bug is related to CPUID function reporting. It seems like QEMU's HVF acceleration isn't correctly setting up the CPU features, specifically regarding virtual address width. This affects how guest operating systems perceive the host's capabilities, which in turn impacts the functionality of those guests. + +The issue doesn't seem to be a translation problem (mistranslation) or assembly-related (assembly lowering). It also doesn't fit into categories like network, socket, etc., because it's about CPUID and virtualization features. However, since HVF is part of QEMU's KVM hypervisor support on macOS, the bug likely lies within the hypervisor's handling of CPU features. + +So, considering all this, the most appropriate category is 'hypervisor' because it pertains to how the hypervisor (QEMU with KVM) presents CPU information to the guest OS. +</think> + +The issue relates to incorrect CPUID reporting in QEMU's HVF-accelerated mode, which affects virtual address bit width. This impacts the hypervisor layer as it incorrectly sets up CPU features for guests. + +hypervisor \ No newline at end of file |