1 files changed, 13 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/1547 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/1547
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..4b27dccd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/1547
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I'm trying to classify this bug report about QEMU and POWER9 emulation. The user mentioned that when using compiler optimizations (like -O2) with gcc 11.3 or later, comparing two floating-point memory operands gives incorrect results. They provided steps to reproduce, including building the code and running it in QEMU.
+
+First, I need to understand what's happening here. The issue arises during runtime because the problem occurs when executing the compiled binary inside QEMU. It's not a compile-time error or something related to system calls; instead, it's about how QEMU emulates certain instructions on the POWER9 architecture.
+
+The bug report suggests that the comparison of floating-point numbers isn't working as expected under emulation. This points towards an issue with how specific instructions are handled by QEMU when optimizations are applied. Since it's a runtime error related to instruction handling, I think this falls under the 'instruction' category because it involves the incorrect execution or interpretation of certain CPU instructions during emulation.
+
+I should also consider other categories: 'syscall' would involve issues with system calls, which isn't mentioned here. 'Runtime' is broader and could include various runtime errors not tied to specific instructions. But since the problem is specifically about floating-point comparisons (which are CPU instructions), 'instruction' seems more precise.
+</think>
+
+The issue pertains to incorrect handling of floating-point comparison instructions under emulation, making it an instruction-related bug.
+
+instruction
\ No newline at end of file