1 files changed, 17 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1818483 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1818483
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..39e4393e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1818483
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report about QEMU user mode and binfmt_misc configuration issues. Let me read through it carefully.
+
+The issue arises when using qemu-user-static in a chroot environment. When they run certain tests, like with the Devscripts module, the output includes unexpected full paths. For example, instead of just "tar" being mentioned, it's "/bin/tar". They traced this back to how the binfmt_misc configuration is set up.
+
+The user tried modifying the flags in binfmt_misc by adding "P", which changes how arguments are passed. But when they did that, QEMU didn't handle the new argument correctly because it now received an extra argv[0] parameter. This caused issues with starting bash in chroot since the argument list was unexpected.
+
+They then modified the QEMU code to adjust how it parses the input arguments. Now, QEMU can handle the additional parameters and correctly extract the original command from argv[2].
+
+The user is asking if there's a way for binfmt_misc to pass an additional flag or environment variable to QEMU so that QEMU knows how to parse the arguments based on the binfmt Misc settings.
+
+So, considering the possible categories: instruction, syscall, runtime. The issue seems to be with how arguments are handled at runtime within QEMU when interacting with binfmt Misc. It's not a problem with an instruction or a system call directly but more about argument parsing during execution.
+
+Therefore, this bug falls under the "runtime" category because it's an error that occurs while the program is running due to unexpected argument handling.
+</think>
+
+runtime
\ No newline at end of file