1 files changed, 19 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1836192 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1836192
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..1488d747
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1836192
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report for QEMU. The user has provided some information about regressions they noticed when running GCC tests on an arm926 target using a specific configuration. Let me break down what's given and figure out which category it fits into.
+
+First, the context: They're using QEMU master after a particular commit. They applied a fix for bug 1834496 but still saw regressions when running GCC tests. The GCC is configured to generate arm10tdmi code with VFP support, and they're testing against the --cpu arm926 option in QEMU.
+
+The issue arises during runtime because they're executing the test binaries on QEMU and observing failures. The problem isn't in a specific instruction that's incorrect but rather in how the CPU is handling the generated code from GCC.
+
+Looking at the possible categories:
+
+- **instruction**: This would apply if there was a specific instruction causing issues, like an assembly-level bug. But here, it's more about overall execution behavior.
+  
+- **syscall**: If the problem were related to system calls not being handled correctly, this category would fit. However, the user didn't mention any syscall errors.
+
+- **runtime**: This seems appropriate because the regressions are happening when running the tests on QEMU, implying issues during execution rather than compile-time or instruction-level problems.
+
+So, putting it all together, the bug is related to runtime behavior when executing GCC-generated code on arm926 with VFP. The issue isn't a specific syscall failure but how the CPU is processing the instructions at runtime.
+</think>
+
+runtime
\ No newline at end of file