1 files changed, 18 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1908 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1908
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..81cf03fc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1908
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+<think>
+Alright, so I'm looking at this bug report where a test case for Cockatrice is causing a segfault in qemu-riscv64-static after a certain commit. The user has provided a backtrace and some code snippets from the generated code.
+
+First, the backtrace points to `code_gen_buffer` which suggests that it's related to the generated machine code by QEMU's TCG (Translation Coroutine Generator). The crash happens at `movzwl 0x0(%r13),%r13d`. This instruction is trying to load a word from an address stored in %r13 into %r13d, but it seems like this might be accessing invalid memory.
+
+Looking at the code around that instruction:
+
+- Before the crash, there's `mov $0xffffffffaf9bb4e0,%r13`, so %r13 is set to a large value.
+- Then `movzwl 0x0(%r13),%r13d` tries to load from memory at %r13.
+
+But wait, in riscv64, user space addresses shouldn't be that high. The address 0xffffffffaf9bb4e0 is way beyond the typical userland range and might actually point to kernel space or unmapped memory. Accessing such an address would cause a segmentation fault because it's not valid for the process.
+
+The instruction causing the crash is part of the generated code by QEMU, which handles the emulation of RISC-V instructions on x86_64. It seems that during translation, QEMU isn't correctly checking whether the address being accessed is valid or not, leading to an invalid memory access.
+
+This kind of bug falls under a runtime error because it's happening while the program is executing and not necessarily at startup or due to a specific instruction decode issue. It's more about how the generated code interacts with memory during execution.
+</think>
+
+runtime
\ No newline at end of file