diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1007')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1007 | 13 |
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1007 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1007 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..e77c37fa --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/1007 @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report about QEMU adding execveat syscall support. The categories given are instruction, syscall, and runtime. Let me break it down step by step. + +First, the term "execveat" stands out. I know that in Linux systems, execve is a system call used to execute a program. The 'at' suffix suggests it's using file descriptors, like how openat works. So execveat must be a variant of execve that uses a directory file descriptor for the path resolution. + +Now, looking at the bug report: "qemu-user: add execveat syscall support." This means that QEMU's user mode emulation is missing support for this particular system call. So, when an application running under QEMU tries to use execveat, it won't work because QEMU doesn't handle it yet. + +So, the issue here is about a missing system call implementation in QEMU. That points directly towards the syscall category. The other categories don't seem to fit as well. Instruction issues would relate to specific CPU instructions not being handled correctly, which isn't the case here. Runtime errors are more about crashes or unexpected behavior during execution, but this is specifically about a missing feature related to system calls. + +Therefore, I'm pretty confident that this bug falls under the syscall category because it's about adding support for a particular system call in QEMU. +</think> + +syscall \ No newline at end of file |