1 files changed, 13 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/system/1233 b/results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/system/1233
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..b0faa217
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/system/1233
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to figure out whether this bug report about QEMU is related to user mode or system mode. The question mentions the RISC-V V extension implementation roadmap. Hmm, RISC-V extensions usually add new instructions or features to the CPU. The V extension is for vector operations, which can be used in various applications.
+
+QEMU supports different CPU models and their extensions. Implementing a new extension like V would likely involve changes in how the emulator handles instructions, maybe adding support in both user and system modes. But since the question is specifically about whether there's a roadmap for implementing RISC-V-V in QEMU, I need to think about where this falls.
+
+System-mode issues in QEMU typically deal with higher privileges, like emulating peripherals or interacting with operating systems. User-mode is more about running applications without needing kernel-level access. Since the V extension affects CPU instruction sets which are part of the system's hardware emulation, it might be a system-level concern. However, sometimes extensions can impact user-space applications as well.
+
+I'm not entirely sure if this is specifically a user or system mode issue. But since RISC-V-V adds new instructions that would affect how the CPU operates in general, and QEMU emulates the entire system, I think it's more aligned with system-mode. Therefore, the classification should be 'system'.
+</think>
+
+The bug report regarding the implementation of the RISC-V V extension in QEMU is related to system mode.
+
+system
\ No newline at end of file