1 files changed, 13 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/system/1693 b/results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/system/1693
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..5150b736
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/system/1693
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to figure out whether this QEMU issue is a user-mode or system-mode problem. The user reported that qemu-system-nios2 isn't working on an s390x (big endian) host when booting a Linux kernel. 
+
+From what I understand, QEMU has two main modes: user mode and system mode. User mode emulation allows running executables of different architectures without a full OS, whereas system mode emulates the entire system, including hardware peripherals, devices, and boots an OS.
+
+In this case, they're using qemu-system-nios2, which suggests they're in system mode because it's meant to emulate the NIOS II system. They're trying to boot a Linux kernel, so that definitely involves system-level operations like device emulation, peripheral interactions, and maybe even specific hardware configurations.
+
+The problem occurs when running on an s390x host, where the code execution path differs from x86. The logs show a branch being taken on s390x but not on x86. This could be due to differences in endianness since s390x is big endian and x86 is little endian. QEMU might have an issue handling this difference during the emulation, particularly with how it translates or executes instructions.
+
+Since the issue involves the kernel booting and execution path divergence, which relates to the system-level emulation rather than just running user-space applications, I think it's a system-mode problem. It likely involves how QEMU handles the NIOS II architecture on different host architectures, especially concerning endianness in system calls or hardware interactions.
+</think>
+
+system
\ No newline at end of file