summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/system/1820
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/system/1820')
-rw-r--r--results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/system/182011
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/system/1820 b/results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/system/1820
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..273c3cce
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/system/1820
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report about QEMU performance between WHPX and TCG as either user-mode or system-mode related. Let me break it down.
+
+The user reports that WHPX is slower than TCG when using Hyper-V. Steps include enabling Hyper-V and running QEMU with specific accelerators. The hardware mentioned includes an Intel i7 CPU, 8GB RAM, and Intel HD graphics.
+
+I know that WHPX and TCG are both acceleration methods in QEMU. WHPX uses the Windows Hypervisor Platform, which is a system-level hypervisor, so it's more about how the host OS interacts with virtualized hardware. TCG is an emulator that runs at a lower level but might not leverage hardware acceleration as effectively.
+
+The issue here seems to involve the interaction between QEMU and the Hyper-V hypervisor, which is part of the operating system's kernel or system-level services. So this likely falls under how the system manages virtualization resources, which would be system-mode related.
+</think>
+
+system
\ No newline at end of file