1 files changed, 13 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/system/1917661 b/results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/system/1917661
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..892167e4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/system/1917661
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm looking at this problem where someone is running QEMU in gdb mode for a RISC-V64 system. They set up a breakpoint and then print the register groups using the "maintenance print register-groups" command in GDB. The output shows some registers like sbadaddr, msounteren, mbadaddr, and htimedeltah, which are being grouped under 'all, general'. But according to the user, these registers should actually belong to the 'all, system, csr' groups instead. They mention this is a bug in QEMU.
+
+Now, I need to figure out whether this bug relates to user-mode or system-mode issues. System-mode bugs usually involve higher privileges, peripherals, devices, and operating systems. User-mode would be more about application-level stuff without needing high privileges.
+
+Looking at the registers listed: sbadaddr is often related to virtual memory translation errors, msounteren might be a mount enable register (though I'm not certain), mbadaddr could be another bad address register for supervisor mode perhaps? And htimedeltah seems like it's part of the hypervisor timer. 
+
+These registers are more likely part of system-level operations rather than user applications. They probably have to do with system state and lower-level functions, which would fall under system-mode. So when QEMU is misclassifying these registers into the 'general' group instead of 'system', it's affecting how GDB interacts with low-level system components.
+
+Therefore, this bug is more about how QEMU handles system-level registers, so it should be classified as a system-mode issue.
+</think>
+
+system
\ No newline at end of file