diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/user/1263747')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/user/1263747 | 15 |
1 files changed, 15 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/user/1263747 b/results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/user/1263747 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..918755b1 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/user/1263747 @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I need to figure out whether this bug report about the Arm64 binary not running in qemu-arm64 is a user-mode issue or a system-mode issue. Let me start by understanding the problem. + +The user provided a binary that runs fine on real aarch64 hardware but doesn't work when run under QEMU's arm64 emulator. It just hangs and uses 100% CPU. They also mentioned compiling OCaml from source, which involved some specific steps including a patch. The test program is a simple "hello, world" that should print and exit. + +So the binary works on real hardware but not in QEMU. That suggests something might be wrong with how QEMU emulates the environment. Now, thinking about QEMU's architecture: it has two main modes—user-mode emulation and system-mode emulation. User-mode runs individual programs without a full OS, while system-mode emulates an entire system including peripherals, devices, etc. + +In this case, the user is running qemu-arm64 as a userspace emulator. That implies they're using QEMU in user-mode to run the binary directly. If it's not printing anything and looping, maybe there's an issue with how QEMU handles certain instructions or system calls in user-mode for arm64. + +Looking deeper into OCaml compilation: the process requires compiling on aarch64 hardware or within a VM that supports aarch64. The provided binary is statically linked, so it should have all necessary dependencies included. If the problem arises only when running under QEMU's user-mode, then it's likely a bug in how QEMU emulates userland processes for arm64. + +I don't see any mention of system-level issues like kernel panics or device driver problems, which would point towards system-mode issues. Instead, the focus is on the binary not executing as expected when run directly under QEMU's user-mode emulator. Therefore, this seems to be a problem with user-mode emulation in QEMU. +</think> + +user \ No newline at end of file |
