summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/user/1263747
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/user/1263747')
-rw-r--r--results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/user/126374715
1 files changed, 15 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/user/1263747 b/results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/user/1263747
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..918755b1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/user/1263747
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to figure out whether this bug report about the Arm64 binary not running in qemu-arm64 is a user-mode issue or a system-mode issue. Let me start by understanding the problem.
+
+The user provided a binary that runs fine on real aarch64 hardware but doesn't work when run under QEMU's arm64 emulator. It just hangs and uses 100% CPU. They also mentioned compiling OCaml from source, which involved some specific steps including a patch. The test program is a simple "hello, world" that should print and exit.
+
+So the binary works on real hardware but not in QEMU. That suggests something might be wrong with how QEMU emulates the environment. Now, thinking about QEMU's architecture: it has two main modes—user-mode emulation and system-mode emulation. User-mode runs individual programs without a full OS, while system-mode emulates an entire system including peripherals, devices, etc.
+
+In this case, the user is running qemu-arm64 as a userspace emulator. That implies they're using QEMU in user-mode to run the binary directly. If it's not printing anything and looping, maybe there's an issue with how QEMU handles certain instructions or system calls in user-mode for arm64.
+
+Looking deeper into OCaml compilation: the process requires compiling on aarch64 hardware or within a VM that supports aarch64. The provided binary is statically linked, so it should have all necessary dependencies included. If the problem arises only when running under QEMU's user-mode, then it's likely a bug in how QEMU emulates userland processes for arm64.
+
+I don't see any mention of system-level issues like kernel panics or device driver problems, which would point towards system-mode issues. Instead, the focus is on the binary not executing as expected when run directly under QEMU's user-mode emulator. Therefore, this seems to be a problem with user-mode emulation in QEMU.
+</think>
+
+user
\ No newline at end of file