1 files changed, 15 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/user/1368 b/results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/user/1368
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..c8220162
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/user/1368
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to figure out whether this bug is user-mode or system-mode related. Let's break down the information given.
+
+The user reported an issue with QEMU where after executing certain assembly instructions, the value of rax changes unexpectedly. The steps they provided show that before execution, rax was 0xfffffffd, which is -3 in two's complement. After moving a value from memory into rax using "mov -0x8(%rbp), %rax", rax becomes 0x7fedf. Then, when executing "movl $0xb8000,(%rax)", rax changes to 0x7fede.
+
+Looking at the code execution in GDB, it seems that after the first instruction, the program counter (pc) moves from 0x2206 to 0x2207. The next instruction changes from "movq" to "movl", which is interesting because "movq" operates on 64-bit registers, while "movl" uses 32 bits.
+
+The memory address -0x8(%rbp) holds the value 0x000000000007fedf. When this is moved into rax, which is a 64-bit register, it should become 0x7fedf. However, after the next instruction, which uses "movl", rax decreases by 1 to 0x7fede.
+
+This suggests that the second instruction might be causing an unintended side effect. The use of "movl" instead of "movq" could be leading to sign extension or some other issue with how the value is being handled in a different register size. Since QEMU is involved, this might relate to how it emulates the CPU instructions.
+
+Considering that the problem arises during instruction execution and involves register operations, it's likely related to user-mode since these instructions are part of the application code being executed by QEMU, not the hypervisor or kernel-level operations.
+</think>
+
+user
\ No newline at end of file