diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/user/1623020')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/user/1623020 | 31 |
1 files changed, 31 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/user/1623020 b/results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/user/1623020 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..e5190c8b --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/user/1623020 @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I'm trying to figure out whether this problem is a user-mode or system-mode issue in QEMU. Let's break it down. + +The user is running a Go program compiled for amd64 on an ARM7 host (Raspberry Pi) using QEMU. They've built the Go binary with GOARCH=amd64, which means it's targeting x86_64 architecture. Then they're using QEMU's user-mode emulation to run this binary on their ARM system. + +When they execute the program with `qemu-x86_64 -strace ./main`, they get a bunch of errors. The output shows that the program is failing during runtime, specifically mentioning panics related to the Go runtime not initializing properly. There are messages like "fatal error: bad timediv" and "runtime: panic before malloc heap initialized," which suggests issues with how the Go runtime is handling memory or system calls under emulation. + +Now, considering QEMU's modes: + +- **User-mode** (also known as CPU emulation) runs individual binaries without a full OS. It translates machine code on-the-fly for different architectures. This mode is often used to run cross-platform applications. + +- **System-mode** emulates an entire computer system, including hardware devices, peripherals, and the OS kernel. It's more complex and resource-intensive. + +The problem here seems to be that the Go program isn't running correctly under user-mode emulation. The errors are occurring within the application runtime, not at the hardware or OS level. Since they're using `-strace`, it looks like they're tracing system calls, which is a user-mode feature. + +Potential issues could include: + +1. **QEMU User-mode Compatibility**: Maybe QEMU isn't properly handling certain syscalls that Go relies on. +2. **Go Runtime Expectations**: The Go binary expects to run on an amd64 system with specific OS and runtime behaviors. If the user-mode emulation doesn't fully replicate these, it can cause panics. +3. **Emulation Configuration**: Perhaps QEMU wasn't configured correctly for this scenario, or there's a missing library or dependency in the host environment. + +Given that the errors are related to Go's runtime initialization and system calls, it points towards issues within the application execution under user-mode. There's no mention of hardware devices failing or kernel-level problems, which would be more indicative of system-mode issues. + +So, classifying this bug report, it seems to fall under 'user' because it relates to running a binary in user-mode without a full OS context and involves application-specific runtime errors. +</think> + +The issue is related to QEMU's ability to run an x86_64 Go program in user-mode on an ARM host. The error messages suggest problems with the Go runtime initializing correctly under emulation, pointing towards user-mode issues rather than system-level hardware or device problems. + +**Answer: user** + +user \ No newline at end of file |