diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/user/1834496')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/user/1834496 | 19 |
1 files changed, 19 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/user/1834496 b/results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/user/1834496 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..e253be49 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/user/1834496 @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I'm looking at this bug report about QEMU regressions on an ARM target when running some GCC tests. The user provided a tarball with binaries and a script. They noticed that after updating to a recent QEMU master commit, several tests started causing QEMU to crash with signal 6 (Aborted). + +First, I need to figure out whether this is related to user-mode or system-mode in QEMU. User-mode typically involves running applications directly under QEMU without an OS, while system-mode simulates a full system including hardware devices and an OS. + +The tests were built with GCC targeting arm-none-linux-gnueabi, which suggests they're meant to run on a Linux environment but compiled for the ARM architecture. The user used --cpu cortex-a9, indicating a specific CPU setup. They also mentioned using "any" in the script, but it didn't make a difference. + +The fact that the tests were working before and now cause QEMU to crash points towards a regression introduced in the recent QEMU changes. Since they're running GCC test binaries, these are likely user applications rather than system-level code or kernel stuff. + +In user-mode, QEMU runs applications directly by translating their machine code without needing an entire OS simulation. If the tests were working before but now crash, it could be a bug in how QEMU handles certain ARM instructions or exceptions under user-mode. + +On the other hand, if this were system-mode, we'd expect issues related to device emulation or higher privilege levels, like kernel operations. But since the tests are application-level and crash with an abort signal (like a segmentation fault), it seems more likely tied to how QEMU is executing the application code—probably user-mode. + +So putting it all together, I think this bug report falls under 'user' mode. +</think> + +The issue relates to running application binaries that cause QEMU to crash. Since these are user-space applications without an OS simulation, it's a user-mode problem. + +user \ No newline at end of file |