summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/user/1901
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/user/1901')
-rw-r--r--results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/user/190113
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/user/1901 b/results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/user/1901
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..c03e1e22
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/user/1901
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I have this problem where the QEMU emulator for SPARC isn't handling the fmul8x16 instruction correctly. The user is saying that when they run their test program in both qemu-sparc64 and qemu-sparc32plus, almost all tests fail because the result is always zero. But when they run the same binary on a real UltraSparc II CPU, everything works fine. 
+
+First, I need to figure out whether this issue falls under user-mode or system-mode emulation. User-mode issues typically involve problems with how the CPU executes instructions, especially at the application level. System-mode issues are more about hardware devices, peripherals, or higher privilege operations.
+
+In this case, the problem is specifically with a floating-point instruction (fmul8x16) which is part of the VIS (Visual Instruction Set) extensions on SPARC processors. The test program is an application that's testing all possible combinations of inputs for this instruction. Since it's about how instructions are executed, especially in user space applications, it sounds like a CPU emulation issue.
+
+I don't think it's related to system devices or higher privilege operations because the test is straightforward—it's just executing a bunch of instructions and checking their results. There's no mention of device interaction or OS-level issues. So this seems isolated to how QEMU is emulating the SPARC CPU, specifically the handling of that particular instruction.
+
+Therefore, I believe this bug report is related to user-mode emulation because it's about the CPU executing application-level instructions incorrectly.
+</think>
+
+user
\ No newline at end of file