diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/616')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/616 | 13 |
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/616 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/616 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..c7c4e8cb --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/616 @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +The problem described involves an incorrect determination of the overflow condition code after addition on the s390x architecture when using QEMU. The issue arises during the execution of a program that uses `__builtin_add_overflow` to check for integer overflows. When compiled and run under QEMU, the overflow checks incorrectly return 'no_overflow = 1', indicating an overflow occurred, whereas the expected result is 'no_overflow = 0' (no overflow). + +The provided assembly code shows that GCC generates instructions utilizing the 'o' condition code to determine overflow. However, when executed in QEMU, this condition code is not set correctly, leading to the incorrect behavior. + +To classify this bug: + +1. **Instruction**: The problem does not stem from a faulty instruction itself but rather how QEMU handles the condition codes after an arithmetic operation. +2. **Syscall**: There are no issues related to system calls mentioned in the report. +3. **Runtime**: This issue occurs during runtime when the program is executing and checking for overflow conditions. + +Thus, the bug falls under the "runtime" category as it relates to how QEMU handles condition codes at runtime, leading to incorrect overflow detection. + +**Answer:** runtime \ No newline at end of file |