diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/instruction/1370')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/instruction/1370 | 15 |
1 files changed, 15 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/instruction/1370 b/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/instruction/1370 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..c1f46c5e --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/instruction/1370 @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +<think> +Okay, let's see. The user is reporting a bug related to the BLSI and BLSR instructions in QEMU. The problem is that the results, specifically the CF flag, are opposite to what the CPU does. + +First, I need to recall what BLSI and BLSR do. BLSI (Bit Lowest Set Isolate) isolates the lowest set bit in a register. BLSR (Bit Lowest Set Reset) clears that lowest set bit. Both instructions also set the carry flag (CF) based on the bit they operate on. + +The user says that when they compile and run the code with these instructions, the CF flag's value is the opposite of what the actual CPU would set. They tested this by comparing the QEMU result with the CPU's. + +The steps to reproduce involve compiling a simple assembly snippet and comparing the results. The issue is specifically with how the instructions are emulated in QEMU. + +Since the problem is about the incorrect behavior of the instructions (BLSI and BLSR) in QEMU, particularly their effect on the CF flag, this points to an error in how these instructions are implemented in QEMU's instruction emulation. + +The categories given are instruction, syscall, or runtime. Since it's directly about the instruction's semantics being wrong, the correct category is "instruction". +</think> + +instruction \ No newline at end of file |