diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/instruction/1761535')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/instruction/1761535 | 17 |
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/instruction/1761535 b/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/instruction/1761535 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..ded39058 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/instruction/1761535 @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +<think> +Okay, let's try to figure this out. The user is using qemu-aarch64-static to run an ARM64 Docker image on an x86 machine. They mentioned that with a newer version of QEMU (2.11.91), running the arm64v8/openjdk image causes a segmentation fault and a core dump when they run `javac`. However, older versions like 2.5.0 and 2.11.1 don't have this issue. The problem is classified as part of QEMU, and I need to determine if it's an instruction, syscall, or runtime error. + +First, the error message says "qemu: uncaught target signal 11 (Segmentation fault) - core dumped." Signal 11 is a segmentation fault, which usually means the program tried to access an invalid memory location. The key here is that this happens with a specific version of QEMU. Since the same setup works with older QEMU versions, it's likely a regression in the newer version. + +Now, the options are instruction, syscall, or runtime. Instruction-related bugs would involve incorrect emulation of CPU instructions. Syscall errors relate to system calls made by the guest OS. Runtime errors are other issues that occur during execution but not directly related to instructions or syscalls. + +In this case, the segmentation fault occurs during the execution of the `javac` command. The problem is specific to a QEMU version, and the core dump suggests that the QEMU process itself is crashing. This might be due to incorrect handling of certain instructions by the newer QEMU version when emulating ARM64. Since the user is running a Java compiler, which is a complex application, it's possible that it's executing some instructions that the newer QEMU version isn't handling correctly, leading to a segfault. + +Therefore, this seems like an issue with how QEMU is emulating the ARM64 instructions, which would fall under the "instruction" category. However, another angle is that the crash is happening at runtime due to some internal QEMU error, which could be a runtime issue. But since the problem is likely due to incorrect instruction emulation causing the segfault, instruction might be the right category. + +Wait, but the user says it's part of QEMU. The categories are for classifying the bug report. If the bug is due to a faulty instruction emulation (like QEMU not handling a specific ARM instruction correctly), then it's an "instruction" bug. If it's a problem with how QEMU handles system calls, then it's "syscall". Otherwise, it's "runtime". + +The error here is a segmentation fault in QEMU itself, which suggests that QEMU is crashing when processing some instruction from the guest. That would point towards an instruction-related issue. For example, maybe a particular ARM instruction generated by the Java toolchain is causing QEMU to segfault because of a bug in the instruction emulator. Since the problem doesn't occur in older versions, it's a regression in how instructions are handled. Therefore, the category should be "instruction". +</think> + +instruction \ No newline at end of file |