diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/runtime/1143')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/runtime/1143 | 11 |
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/runtime/1143 b/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/runtime/1143 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..c7128439 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/runtime/1143 @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +<think> +Okay, let's try to figure out how to classify this bug report. The user is talking about QEMU missing breakpoints when a function is split across two memory pages. They provided some GDB output and QEMU traces showing that a breakpoint set at 0x10c00e isn't hit if the function starts on a different page. But when the function is executed step-by-step with another breakpoint in the same page, the breakpoint at 0x10c00e works. + +Hmm, so the issue seems related to how QEMU handles breakpoints when the code crosses page boundaries. The user mentioned looking into the QEMU translator code and the check_for_breakpoint function. They think that maybe the check isn't considering the entire function being in the same page before skipping step-by-step execution. But they're unsure because the Translation Block (TB) is created after the check. + +Wait, QEMU uses dynamic translation, breaking code into TBs. If a function spans two pages, maybe the TB doesn't include the entire function, especially if there's a page boundary. So when setting a breakpoint in a different page, maybe QEMU's translator isn't generating the necessary code to check for that breakpoint because it's in a different TB. Or perhaps the check_for_breakpoint is only looking within the current TB, and if the breakpoint is in another page (another TB), it's not being detected. + +The problem occurs during execution when QEMU runs the translated code. The breakpoints are supposed to be inserted, but if the TB doesn't cover the entire function, maybe the breakpoint isn't properly placed or checked. This seems like a runtime issue because it's about how QEMU executes the code and handles breakpoints during that execution. It's not about a specific instruction being faulty (which would be 'instruction'), nor is it a syscall issue. So the category is likely 'runtime'. +</think> + +runtime \ No newline at end of file |