1 files changed, 9 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/runtime/1319100 b/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/runtime/1319100
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..e4fe864a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/runtime/1319100
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+<think>
+Okay, let's see. The user is describing a bug in qemu-arm-static related to signal handling causing mono and Java to hang. They mentioned that when running mono in a chroot with qemu-user-static, a signal during termination is routed to the host. The example shows that using strace, there's a futex call blocking. The key part here is the signal handling issue between threads, specifically with signals like SIGPWR being used during termination.
+
+The problem seems to be that QEMU isn't properly handling the signals that are sent between threads in the emulated environment. When mono tries to terminate, it uses signals to communicate between threads, but QEMU is either intercepting them incorrectly or not passing them along properly, causing the process to hang. The OpenSUSE patch mentioned probably addresses how QEMU handles these signals, especially with SA_RESTART or similar flags, which affects how system calls are restarted after a signal.
+
+Looking at the categories: instruction, syscall, runtime. The issue isn't about a faulty instruction (like an illegal opcode or incorrect execution of an instruction). It's not directly a syscall error, although syscalls are involved (like tgkill and futex). The core problem is how QEMU handles signals during runtime, particularly the interaction between the emulated process's signals and the host's signal handling. The runtime category covers other runtime errors not fitting into instruction or syscall. Since the bug is about signal handling during program execution, which is part of the runtime behavior of QEMU, the correct category should be runtime.
+</think>
+
+runtime
\ No newline at end of file