diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/runtime/1397')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/runtime/1397 | 19 |
1 files changed, 19 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/runtime/1397 b/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/runtime/1397 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..eefca058 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/runtime/1397 @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +<think> +Okay, let's see. The user provided a bug report about QEMU's RISC-V implementation where using 'break' and 'hbreak' commands doesn't set breakpoints at the correct address when symbols are provided. The task is to classify this into one of three categories: instruction, syscall, or runtime. + +First, I need to understand what each category means. The 'instruction' category is for faulty instructions described in the bug. 'Syscall' is for errors related to system calls. 'Runtime' covers other runtime errors. + +The bug here is about setting breakpoints incorrectly. Breakpoints usually involve the debugger inserting a specific instruction (like a trap) into the code. If the address isn't set correctly when using symbols, maybe the debugger isn't translating the symbol to the right address. But does that relate to a specific instruction being faulty? Or is it a runtime issue where the debugger's logic for handling symbols is wrong? + +If the problem is that the debugger (like GDB) sends the breakpoint command to QEMU, and QEMU's RISC-V target isn't handling the breakpoint instruction correctly, that might be an instruction issue. However, if the issue is that the symbol resolution is incorrect, leading to the wrong address being used, that's more about how symbols are processed, which might be a runtime error in the debugger or QEMU's handling of symbols. + +Wait, the user says "when providing symbols". So when symbols are provided (like function names), the breakpoint isn't set at the correct address. This might be due to incorrect symbol resolution. But QEMU itself doesn't handle symbol resolution; that's usually done by the debugger (GDB). Unless there's a part in QEMU that processes symbols, but I think QEMU relies on GDB for breakpoints. Hmm. + +Alternatively, maybe the QEMU RISC-V CPU model has an issue with how it processes the break or hbreak instructions. For example, if the breakpoint instruction isn't properly emulated, causing the debugger to not hit it. But the problem here is the address where the breakpoint is set, not the execution of the break instruction itself. + +If the debugger is passing the correct address based on symbols, but QEMU is setting the breakpoint at the wrong address, that could be a runtime error in QEMU's breakpoint handling logic. Since the problem is that the breakpoint isn't set correctly when symbols are involved, but the symbols themselves are resolved by the debugger. So perhaps QEMU's code that takes the address from GDB and sets the breakpoint isn't handling it correctly. That would be a runtime error in QEMU's execution of the breakpoint setting process. + +Therefore, the category might be 'runtime'. Alternatively, if it's about the actual instruction execution, it's 'instruction'. But since the problem is about the address not being set correctly (possibly due to symbol resolution or handling), it's more of a runtime issue. So the answer is 'runtime'. +</think> + +runtime \ No newline at end of file |