summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/runtime/1756807
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/runtime/1756807')
-rw-r--r--results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/runtime/175680721
1 files changed, 21 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/runtime/1756807 b/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/runtime/1756807
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..8095ed29
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/runtime/1756807
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+<think>
+Okay, let's try to figure out how to classify this bug report. The user is talking about a performance regression in qemu-user combined with proot. The main issue is that a simple grep command takes way longer on Ubuntu 18.04 compared to 16.04. The problem seems to be related to the combination of qemu and proot, but the user isn't sure which one is causing it. 
+
+First, I need to understand what these tools do. Qemu-user is used for running binaries from one architecture on another, like running ARM binaries on x86. PRoot is a user-space implementation of chroot, mount --bind, and other related operations, allowing to run programs in a modified environment without needing root privileges.
+
+The user is using proot with qemu-arm-static to create an ARM chroot environment. The performance issue here is that on 18.04, the same command that was fast on 16.04 is now over 100 times slower. The user has checked that the proot version hasn't changed, so the difference is likely in QEMU. 
+
+The key here is the performance degradation. The problem isn't about a crash or an error message but about speed. The user mentions that the QEMU version on 18.04 is newer (2.11.1 vs 2.10.1). Since the problem appears with the newer version, it's possible that a change in QEMU introduced this regression.
+
+The categories to choose from are instruction, syscall, or runtime. 
+
+- Instruction would imply that there's a wrong instruction being executed, maybe a bug in the emulation of specific CPU instructions. 
+- Syscall would relate to system calls handling, like incorrect or slow handling of certain syscalls.
+- Runtime is for other runtime errors not fitting into the first two.
+
+In this case, the problem is about performance, which is a runtime issue. The user is not reporting that a syscall is failing, but that operations are taking much longer. Even though syscalls might be involved, the primary classification here would be runtime because it's about execution speed rather than a specific syscall error or incorrect instruction.
+
+So the answer should be 'runtime'.
+</think>
+
+runtime
\ No newline at end of file