diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/runtime/714')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/runtime/714 | 15 |
1 files changed, 15 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/runtime/714 b/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/runtime/714 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..89621ac5 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/runtime/714 @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +<think> +Okay, let's see. The user is reporting an issue with QEMU where command line arguments aren't being passed correctly when using user-space semihosting. The problem is that argc is always 1 and argv[0] has random characters. They provided examples with QEMU 5.2 and 6.1. The steps to reproduce involve compiling a C++ program with the ARM embedded toolchain and running it in QEMU with the cortex-m7 CPU. + +First, I need to figure out what category this falls into: instruction, syscall, or runtime. The categories are defined as instruction (faulty instruction), syscall (syscall error), or runtime (other runtime errors). + +The issue here is about passing command-line arguments. Semihosting is a mechanism used by embedded programs to perform I/O operations by trapping into the host's debugger or emulator (like QEMU). When you run the program in QEMU with semihosting, the emulator is supposed to handle the command-line arguments and pass them to the program. + +The problem seems to be that QEMU isn't correctly passing the argv parameters. The user mentioned that argc is 1 instead of the expected value, and argv[0] is incorrect. This isn't about a specific CPU instruction being wrong, so it's not an "instruction" category. It's also not directly about a syscall, because syscalls are typically OS-level function calls. However, semihosting involves communication between the user-space program and the emulator, which might involve some kind of syscall-like mechanism. + +But wait, in the context of QEMU, semihosting is handled through specific trapped instructions that the emulator intercepts. The emulator then performs actions like file I/O or argument passing. If the arguments aren't being passed correctly, it might be a runtime error in how QEMU handles the semihosting requests. The runtime category is for other runtime errors not fitting into instruction or syscall. Since the issue is about the emulator not correctly processing the command-line arguments during the program's execution, it's likely a runtime error. + +Another angle: syscall errors would involve incorrect handling of system calls made by the program. But in this case, the problem is with the setup of the command-line arguments before the program starts running. However, since the program is using semihosting, which is emulated by QEMU, the failure is in the emulator's handling of the semihosting interface. That's part of QEMU's runtime processing of the semihosted environment. So the correct category is runtime. +</think> + +runtime \ No newline at end of file |