1 files changed, 11 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/syscall/1749393 b/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/syscall/1749393
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..f6b8f4e0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/syscall/1749393
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+<think>
+Okay, let's try to figure out the category for this bug report. The user is saying that sbrk() isn't working under qemu-user when running a PIE-compiled bash binary. The problem causes allocation failures in bash's custom malloc, which uses sbrk. They mention that using glibc's malloc works, implying the issue might be with how sbrk is handled in qemu-user specifically with PIE.
+
+First, I need to recall what sbrk does. It's a syscall used to adjust the program break, which is how a process manages its heap. So sbrk is a system call. The problem arises when qemu-user is emulating the environment for a different architecture (like i386 on amd64), and when the binary is PIE (Position Independent Executable), which affects how addresses are handled.
+
+The user says that when bash is PIE, sbrk fails in qemu-user, but not when using glibc's malloc. This suggests that the issue is related to how qemu-user handles the sbrk syscall in the context of PIE binaries. Since sbrk is a syscall, the problem might be in how qemu-user is processing that particular syscall for PIE executables.
+
+The categories given are instruction, syscall, or runtime. Since the problem seems to be tied directly to the sbrk system call not functioning correctly under qemu-user, the most likely category here is "syscall". The error isn't about incorrect instructions (which would be 'instruction') but rather an issue with the system call interface in qemu-user. The 'runtime' category is for other runtime errors, but since the root cause is likely in the syscall handling, 'syscall' is the best fit.
+</think>
+
+syscall
\ No newline at end of file