1 files changed, 13 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/syscall/263 b/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/syscall/263
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..d54bf411
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/syscall/263
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, let's see. The user is reporting that readdir() returns NULL with errno=EOVERFLOW in a 32-bit user-static QEMU setup on a 64-bit host. Hmm.
+
+First, I need to recall what EOVERFLOW means. From what I remember, EOVERFLOW is an error that occurs when the result of a function would exceed the maximum value that can be stored in a data type. For example, if a function returns a value that's too big for a 32-bit integer, this error might be triggered.
+
+Now, QEMU's user-mode emulation allows running 32-bit programs on a 64-bit system. The problem here is happening in readdir(), which is a system call used to read directory entries. The issue is specific to the 32-bit static binary in QEMU. The error is EOVERFLOW, which suggests a data size mismatch between the 32-bit and 64-bit environments.
+
+Since readdir() is a system call, the error is likely related to how the system call is handled between the 32-bit user space and the 64-bit host kernel. The 32-bit application expects certain data structures, but the host's 64-bit system might be passing something that's too large for the 32-bit process to handle, leading to EOVERFLOW. This seems like a system call handling issue in QEMU's user-mode emulation.
+
+The categories are instruction, syscall, or runtime. Since the problem is tied to the system call's behavior and the error code related to data size during the syscall, it's probably a syscall category. Instruction errors are about incorrect CPU instructions, which doesn't fit here. Runtime errors are more general, but the specific syscall error points to the syscall category.
+</think>
+
+syscall
\ No newline at end of file