From 35f097a31e1c58892a69178b84ddba658efe9c8f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christian Krinitsin Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2025 16:45:54 +0200 Subject: manually review misclassifications --- .../no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/analysis.csv | 3 +++ .../no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/categories.csv | 7 +++---- .../reasoning/instruction/1022 | 9 +++++++++ .../reasoning/instruction/1824344 | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ .../reasoning/instruction/1833 | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ .../reasoning/instruction/1898954 | 5 +++++ .../reasoning/instruction/1908626 | 7 +++++++ .../reasoning/instruction/1915327 | 7 +++++++ .../reasoning/instruction/1967248 | 9 +++++++++ .../reasoning/instruction/2374 | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ .../reasoning/instruction/2495 | 7 +++++++ .../reasoning/manual-review/1022 | 9 --------- .../reasoning/manual-review/1550503 | 9 --------- .../reasoning/manual-review/1593 | 7 ------- .../reasoning/manual-review/1617929 | 5 ----- .../reasoning/manual-review/1738545 | 13 ------------- .../reasoning/manual-review/1805913 | 3 --- .../reasoning/manual-review/1824344 | 18 ------------------ .../reasoning/manual-review/1830 | 14 -------------- .../reasoning/manual-review/1833 | 21 --------------------- .../reasoning/manual-review/1854738 | 11 ----------- .../reasoning/manual-review/1858461 | 7 ------- .../reasoning/manual-review/1869782 | 11 ----------- .../reasoning/manual-review/1895 | 7 ------- .../reasoning/manual-review/1898954 | 5 ----- .../reasoning/manual-review/1906193 | 13 ------------- .../reasoning/manual-review/1908626 | 7 ------- .../reasoning/manual-review/1910 | 14 -------------- .../reasoning/manual-review/1915327 | 7 ------- .../reasoning/manual-review/1967248 | 9 --------- .../reasoning/manual-review/2374 | 20 -------------------- .../reasoning/manual-review/2448 | 5 ----- .../reasoning/manual-review/2495 | 7 ------- .../reasoning/manual-review/2553 | 12 ------------ .../reasoning/manual-review/2560 | 5 ----- .../reasoning/manual-review/306 | 1 - .../reasoning/manual-review/739785 | 11 ----------- .../reasoning/manual-review/829 | 18 ------------------ .../reasoning/runtime/1550503 | 9 +++++++++ .../reasoning/runtime/1593 | 7 +++++++ .../reasoning/runtime/1854738 | 11 +++++++++++ .../reasoning/runtime/1869782 | 11 +++++++++++ .../reasoning/runtime/1895 | 7 +++++++ .../reasoning/runtime/1910 | 14 ++++++++++++++ .../reasoning/runtime/2448 | 5 +++++ .../reasoning/syscall/1617929 | 5 +++++ .../reasoning/syscall/1738545 | 13 +++++++++++++ .../reasoning/syscall/1805913 | 3 +++ .../reasoning/syscall/1830 | 14 ++++++++++++++ .../reasoning/syscall/1858461 | 7 +++++++ .../reasoning/syscall/1906193 | 13 +++++++++++++ .../reasoning/syscall/2553 | 12 ++++++++++++ .../reasoning/syscall/2560 | 5 +++++ .../reasoning/syscall/306 | 1 + .../reasoning/syscall/739785 | 11 +++++++++++ .../reasoning/syscall/829 | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 56 files changed, 275 insertions(+), 273 deletions(-) create mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/analysis.csv create mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/instruction/1022 create mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/instruction/1824344 create mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/instruction/1833 create mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/instruction/1898954 create mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/instruction/1908626 create mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/instruction/1915327 create mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/instruction/1967248 create mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/instruction/2374 create mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/instruction/2495 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1022 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1550503 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1593 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1617929 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1738545 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1805913 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1824344 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1830 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1833 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1854738 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1858461 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1869782 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1895 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1898954 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1906193 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1908626 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1910 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1915327 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1967248 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/2374 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/2448 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/2495 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/2553 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/2560 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/306 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/739785 delete mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/829 create mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/runtime/1550503 create mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/runtime/1593 create mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/runtime/1854738 create mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/runtime/1869782 create mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/runtime/1895 create mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/runtime/1910 create mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/runtime/2448 create mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/syscall/1617929 create mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/syscall/1738545 create mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/syscall/1805913 create mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/syscall/1830 create mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/syscall/1858461 create mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/syscall/1906193 create mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/syscall/2553 create mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/syscall/2560 create mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/syscall/306 create mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/syscall/739785 create mode 100644 results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/syscall/829 diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/analysis.csv b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/analysis.csv new file mode 100644 index 00000000..a62bdf52 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/analysis.csv @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +category, count +instruction, 116 +runtime, 3 diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/categories.csv b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/categories.csv index 489a55f4..1de6fd2e 100644 --- a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/categories.csv +++ b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/categories.csv @@ -1,5 +1,4 @@ category, count -syscall, 131 -runtime, 202 -manual-review, 27 -instruction, 191 +instruction, 200 +runtime, 209 +syscall, 142 diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/instruction/1022 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/instruction/1022 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..a536c9c2 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/instruction/1022 @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +The issue arises when QEMU's RISC-V simulation encounters the `vsra.vx` instruction, leading to a segmentation fault. The backtrace points to a problem within the code generation buffer, specifically related to how the instruction is being processed. + +The bug is tied to an incorrect or unsupported handling of the vector instruction `vsra.vx`. This suggests that there's either a mistake in the implementation of this specific instruction within QEMU or perhaps missing support for it under certain configurations. + +Given that the segmentation fault occurs during the execution of a particular instruction, the most appropriate category for this bug is: + +**instruction** + +This classification indicates that the problem lies within how a specific CPU instruction is handled by QEMU. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/instruction/1824344 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/instruction/1824344 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..984f0de0 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/instruction/1824344 @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +The issue described involves an incorrect error code being set when executing certain return instructions (iret/iretq/retf) in user space under specific conditions, leading to potential misclassification of page faults by the guest OS. This is related to how QEMU handles instruction execution and exception handling. + +**instruction** + +This classification is appropriate because the bug pertains to the behavior of specific x86 instructions (iret, iretq, retf) within QEMU's emulation layer, particularly concerning error code generation during page faults. The incorrect setting of bits in the error code directly relates to how these instructions are handled by QEMU when a page fault occurs. + +The problem arises from QEMU not correctly setting bit 2 of the error code pushed onto the stack when such an instruction causes a page fault. In x86 architecture, bit 2 of the error code indicates whether the fault occurred in user mode (bit clear) or supervisor mode (bit set). If this bit is incorrectly left unset, the guest operating system may misinterpret the nature of the fault, potentially leading to erroneous kernel panic situations. + +Furthermore, the provided test case involves executing a small C program that attempts to return from a function using `retf` with an invalid stack pointer. This triggers a page fault, and QEMU's handling (or mishandling) of this scenario leads to the incorrect error code being pushed. The guest OS, relying on these codes for accurate exception handling, may then behave incorrectly. + +The fact that this bug is reproducible only when using specific CPU configurations (like those with SMAP support) suggests that it is tied to how QEMU emulates certain CPU features and handles exceptions in user space versus kernel space. The classification as an "instruction" issue is therefore most fitting because the root cause lies in the emulation of x86 instructions and their associated exception handling mechanisms. + +In summary, this bug report centers around a problem with instruction-level behavior within QEMU's emulation layer, specifically concerning error code generation during page faults triggered by certain return instructions. Therefore, categorizing it under "instruction" accurately reflects the nature of the issue. + +**Final Answer** +The appropriate category for this bug is: + +\boxed{instruction} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/instruction/1833 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/instruction/1833 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..e8dd75d3 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/instruction/1833 @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +The issue described pertains to an incorrect implementation of the ARM64 SME ST1Q instruction within QEMU, leading to improper data storage. This is classified under **instruction** as it involves a specific faulty CPU instruction implementation. + +**Step-by-Step Explanation:** + +1. **Understanding the Bug:** The problem lies in how the `ST1Q` (Store 128-bit element) SME instruction is implemented in QEMU. Instead of correctly storing 16 bytes per 128-bit element, it only stores 9 bytes. + +2. **Identifying the Cause:** The incorrect behavior was traced to a specific line in QEMU's source code (`sme_helper.c`), where an offset adjustment used `+1` instead of `+8`, leading to improper data alignment and storage. + +3. **Reproducing the Issue:** A test program was provided that demonstrates the bug. When run, it shows that after executing the `ST1Q` instruction, only a portion of the expected bytes are correctly copied from source to destination memory locations. + +4. **Impact Analysis:** This bug affects data integrity when using SME instructions in QEMU, particularly for contiguous store operations involving 128-bit elements. Such errors can lead to silent data corruption or incorrect program behavior in applications relying on these instructions. + +5. **Solution:** The fix involves correcting the offset adjustment from `+1` to `+8`, ensuring that each 128-bit element is stored correctly as 16 bytes, aligning with the expected behavior of the `ST1Q` instruction. + +**Classification: Instruction** + +The bug report revolves around an issue with a specific CPU instruction's implementation within QEMU. Therefore, it falls under the **instruction** category. + +```plaintext +instruction +``` \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/instruction/1898954 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/instruction/1898954 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..b388f888 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/instruction/1898954 @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ +The user provided a detailed bug report related to QEMU where executing an `f1` opcode causes issues on Windows but works fine elsewhere. The problem seems to be specific to how QEMU handles certain instructions, particularly the `f1` opcode. + +**Answer: instruction** + +This classification is based on the description pointing towards a faulty or improperly handled CPU instruction (`f1`) within QEMU's emulation layer. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/instruction/1908626 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/instruction/1908626 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..ab83b68c --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/instruction/1908626 @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +The issue revolves around the use of an atomic test-and-set instruction in the spinlock implementation within PostgreSQL/Greenplum when run under QEMU user emulation for ARM64. The problem does not occur on physical ARM64 hardware but arises specifically within the emulated environment provided by QEMU. This suggests that there is a malfunction or misbehavior in how QEMU handles the specific instruction used for the test-and-set operation, which is crucial for the spinlock functionality. + +The bug report indicates that the spinlock mechanism fails under QEMU, leading to timeouts and PANIC errors. Since this behavior does not manifest on physical hardware, it points towards an issue with how QEMU emulates the instruction rather than a flaw in the instruction itself or the operating system's syscalls. Therefore, the problem is classified as an issue related to an instruction. + +```plaintext +instruction +``` \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/instruction/1915327 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/instruction/1915327 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..6ca89558 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/instruction/1915327 @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +The issue revolves around incorrect behavior of the `cmpxchg` instruction in QEMU's TCG (Tiny Code Generator) implementation when compared to real CPU behavior. Specifically, QEMU incorrectly zero-extends the EAX register to RAX after a `cmpxchg` operation, which does not align with how the instruction should behave according to Intel specifications. + +**Category: instruction** + +The problem is clearly tied to an incorrect implementation of a specific x86_64 instruction (`cmpxchg`) within QEMU's TCG. This misbehavior affects both regular and locked versions of the `cmpxchg` instruction, leading to unexpected results in applications that rely on this instruction, such as those developed with BPF (Berkeley Packet Filter). The incorrect zero-extension of EAX to RAX violates the expected semantics defined by Intel's documentation, where the accumulator should remain unchanged if the comparison matches. + +Since this is a problem with how QEMU emulates a specific CPU instruction, it falls under the "instruction" category. This classification helps in directing the bug report to the appropriate part of the codebase and development team within the QEMU project that handles instruction emulation. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/instruction/1967248 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/instruction/1967248 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..b66e2947 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/instruction/1967248 @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +The issue described involves an uncaught target signal 5 (Trace/breakpoint trap) when running a binary under QEMU, but not when using GDB. The user also mentions that QEMU's 32-bit ARM Linux-user mode does not correctly handle BKPT instructions by converting them into SIGTRAP signals. + +**Analysis:** +- The problem revolves around the handling of BKPT (breakpoint) instructions in QEMU. +- Specifically, it appears that QEMU is not properly translating these instructions into the appropriate SIGTRAP signal, which is crucial for debugging purposes. +- This misbehavior leads to a core dump when running the program normally but works as expected under GDB. + +**Classification:** +This issue pertains to how QEMU processes specific ARM instructions (BKPT). Therefore, it falls under the **instruction** category. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/instruction/2374 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/instruction/2374 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..db22962c --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/instruction/2374 @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@ +The issue lies within the implementation of the FMOPA/FMOPS instructions in QEMU's AArch64 TCG helper functions. Specifically, the problem arises from an invalid pointer being used for floating-point status when handling 32-bit operands, leading to incorrect NaN generation. + +Step-by-step explanation: + +1. **Bug Identification**: + - The `sme_fmopa_s` function in `target/arm/tcg/sme_helper.c` is responsible for matrix multiplication and accumulation. + - When performing 32-bit floating-point operations, the function incorrectly uses an invalid pointer (`vst`) instead of a properly initialized local copy (`fpst`) to handle the floating-point status. + +2. **Consequences**: + - This misuse causes NaN results not to be generated as default NaNs but instead retain their non-default form. + - The test case provided demonstrates this by expecting default NaNs (0x0000c07f) but receiving non-default NaNs (0xffffffff). + +3. **Solution**: + - Modify the function to use `&fpst` instead of `vst` when invoking `float32_muladd`. + - This ensures that the correct floating-point status is used, leading to proper default NaN generation. + +4. **Category Classification**: + - The issue pertains directly to an instruction's implementation within QEMU, making it a clear case of an **instruction** bug. + +The problem is classified under the **instruction** category because it involves incorrect behavior in implementing specific CPU instructions (FMOPA/FMOPS) within the QEMU emulator. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/instruction/2495 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/instruction/2495 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..7a4345ab --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/instruction/2495 @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +The issue pertains to incorrect behavior in translating MMX instructions when REX prefixes are involved. This affects how QEMU generates TCG (Tiny Code Generator) code for such instructions, leading to incorrect execution outcomes. The problem is specific to the handling of certain x86-64 MMX instructions with redundant or varying REX prefixes. + +The correct category for this bug report is: + +**instruction** + +This categorization aligns with the fact that the issue revolves around how QEMU processes specific x86-64 MMX instructions and their corresponding REX prefixes, leading to invalid TCG code generation. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1022 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1022 deleted file mode 100644 index a536c9c2..00000000 --- a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1022 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,9 +0,0 @@ -The issue arises when QEMU's RISC-V simulation encounters the `vsra.vx` instruction, leading to a segmentation fault. The backtrace points to a problem within the code generation buffer, specifically related to how the instruction is being processed. - -The bug is tied to an incorrect or unsupported handling of the vector instruction `vsra.vx`. This suggests that there's either a mistake in the implementation of this specific instruction within QEMU or perhaps missing support for it under certain configurations. - -Given that the segmentation fault occurs during the execution of a particular instruction, the most appropriate category for this bug is: - -**instruction** - -This classification indicates that the problem lies within how a specific CPU instruction is handled by QEMU. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1550503 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1550503 deleted file mode 100644 index 2e52922e..00000000 --- a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1550503 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,9 +0,0 @@ -The issue reported is related to an expression that is always true due to specific bitmasks and defines in the code. This type of bug is typically detected at compile-time or during static analysis rather than causing a runtime error. It falls under the category of code style issues, which are generally flagged by tools like sparse or other static analyzers. - -However, based on the provided categories: - -instruction: Refers to issues with specific instructions (e.g., incorrect opcode handling). -syscall: Pertains to errors in system calls. -runtime: Encompasses other errors that occur during execution. - -The most appropriate category for this issue is **runtime**, as it relates to the behavior of the code during execution, even though it's a static analysis finding. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1593 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1593 deleted file mode 100644 index c3f980de..00000000 --- a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1593 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,7 +0,0 @@ -The issue here revolves around how QEMU's SLIRP implementation handles network binding when using the `hostfwd` option. The user expects that specifying a particular bind address (like `127.0.0.1`) would limit the listening socket to only that interface. However, due to the use of `INADDR_ANY`, the application ends up binding to all available interfaces (`*.*`), which is not the intended behavior. - -This problem arises from within the code logic of QEMU's SLIRP module, specifically in how it interprets and applies user-provided network settings during runtime. It doesn't pertain to faulty instructions or incorrect system calls but rather to a logical error in the application's handling of configuration parameters. - -**runtime** - -The issue is categorized under "runtime" because it relates to how QEMU executes and handles network configurations during its operation, rather than being an instruction-level fault or a syscall error. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1617929 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1617929 deleted file mode 100644 index 934062a2..00000000 --- a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1617929 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,5 +0,0 @@ -The issue revolves around the `pselect` system call causing QEMU to hang. The backtrace from GDB and strace log both point to problems occurring during or after executing this system call. The problem is reproducible but not consistently, and it affects stable versions as well. - -**Answer: syscall** - -The bug report indicates a problem with the `pselect` system call within QEMU, leading to hangs during execution. This falls under the `syscall` category since the issue is directly related to how QEMU handles this specific system call. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1738545 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1738545 deleted file mode 100644 index d16af140..00000000 --- a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1738545 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,13 +0,0 @@ -The issue arises when running a Go binary compiled with `gccgo-7` on QEMU for ARM architecture, specifically when using `qemu-user`. The error message indicates an "mmap errno 9", which corresponds to "Bad file descriptor". This suggests that there's a problem with how system calls related to memory mapping are being handled within QEMU. Since the same binary works fine on real hardware but fails under emulation, it points towards an incompatibility or misimplementation in how QEMU handles certain syscalls. - -Given that the error is tied to `mmap`, which is a system call used for memory management, and considering that this is specific to QEMU's emulation layer, the most appropriate category for this bug would be **syscall**. This categorization aligns with issues related to system calls not functioning as expected within the emulated environment. - -**Step-by-step Explanation:** - -1. **Identify the Error:** The error message "mmap errno 9" signifies that the `mmap` system call is failing with the error code 9, which translates to "Bad file descriptor". - -2. **Understand the Context:** The Go binary works on real hardware but fails when run under QEMU for ARM. This suggests that the issue lies within how QEMU emulates certain system calls. - -3. **Categorize the Bug:** Since the problem is directly related to a system call (`mmap`) not behaving correctly in the emulated environment, it falls under the **syscall** category. - -4. **Conclusion:** The bug report should be classified as a syscall issue because it pertains to the failure of a specific system call within QEMU's emulation layer. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1805913 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1805913 deleted file mode 100644 index 2227f171..00000000 --- a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1805913 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,3 +0,0 @@ -The bug report discusses an issue where readdir() returns NULL with errno=EOVERFLOW when running a 32-bit user-static qemu on a 64-bit host. The root cause is related to how glibc handles inode numbers and offsets, which don't fit into 32-bit ranges when using getdents64() from the 64-bit kernel. This leads to EOVERFLOW as per the C standard's requirements for readdir(). The problem arises in the interaction between the 32-bit environment (qemu) and the underlying 64-bit system calls. - -The issue is classified under "syscall" because it pertains to errors occurring during system calls, specifically how getdents64() handles inode numbers and offsets across different bitness environments. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1824344 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1824344 deleted file mode 100644 index 984f0de0..00000000 --- a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1824344 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,18 +0,0 @@ -The issue described involves an incorrect error code being set when executing certain return instructions (iret/iretq/retf) in user space under specific conditions, leading to potential misclassification of page faults by the guest OS. This is related to how QEMU handles instruction execution and exception handling. - -**instruction** - -This classification is appropriate because the bug pertains to the behavior of specific x86 instructions (iret, iretq, retf) within QEMU's emulation layer, particularly concerning error code generation during page faults. The incorrect setting of bits in the error code directly relates to how these instructions are handled by QEMU when a page fault occurs. - -The problem arises from QEMU not correctly setting bit 2 of the error code pushed onto the stack when such an instruction causes a page fault. In x86 architecture, bit 2 of the error code indicates whether the fault occurred in user mode (bit clear) or supervisor mode (bit set). If this bit is incorrectly left unset, the guest operating system may misinterpret the nature of the fault, potentially leading to erroneous kernel panic situations. - -Furthermore, the provided test case involves executing a small C program that attempts to return from a function using `retf` with an invalid stack pointer. This triggers a page fault, and QEMU's handling (or mishandling) of this scenario leads to the incorrect error code being pushed. The guest OS, relying on these codes for accurate exception handling, may then behave incorrectly. - -The fact that this bug is reproducible only when using specific CPU configurations (like those with SMAP support) suggests that it is tied to how QEMU emulates certain CPU features and handles exceptions in user space versus kernel space. The classification as an "instruction" issue is therefore most fitting because the root cause lies in the emulation of x86 instructions and their associated exception handling mechanisms. - -In summary, this bug report centers around a problem with instruction-level behavior within QEMU's emulation layer, specifically concerning error code generation during page faults triggered by certain return instructions. Therefore, categorizing it under "instruction" accurately reflects the nature of the issue. - -**Final Answer** -The appropriate category for this bug is: - -\boxed{instruction} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1830 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1830 deleted file mode 100644 index e40ef884..00000000 --- a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1830 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,14 +0,0 @@ -The issue describes a problem where a command hangs and consumes excessive CPU within a CentOS 7 arm64 container running on an Ubuntu 22 AMD64 host. The hanging process is related to the dynamic linker (`ld-2.17.so`), which suggests that it might be stuck in a system call or experiencing issues with process execution. - -Key points: -1. **Command Hanging**: The `LD_DEBUG=all /lib64/ld-2.17.so --list /usr/bin/true` command hangs and takes over the CPU. -2. **Process State**: The process is in state 'R' (Running), indicating it's active but not completing. -3. **Environment Specificity**: This occurs specifically on an AMD64 host running ARM64 containers via QEMU, but not on native ARM64 hardware or Ubuntu 20.04 hosts. - -Given that the problem is environment-specific and involves process execution in a cross-architecture setup using QEMU, it likely relates to how system calls are handled in the emulation layer. This points towards issues with system call translation or handling within QEMU. - -Therefore, the most appropriate category for this bug report is: - -**syscall** - -This categorization suggests that the issue lies in how system calls are being managed or translated by QEMU when running ARM64 binaries on an AMD64 host. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1833 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1833 deleted file mode 100644 index e8dd75d3..00000000 --- a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1833 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,21 +0,0 @@ -The issue described pertains to an incorrect implementation of the ARM64 SME ST1Q instruction within QEMU, leading to improper data storage. This is classified under **instruction** as it involves a specific faulty CPU instruction implementation. - -**Step-by-Step Explanation:** - -1. **Understanding the Bug:** The problem lies in how the `ST1Q` (Store 128-bit element) SME instruction is implemented in QEMU. Instead of correctly storing 16 bytes per 128-bit element, it only stores 9 bytes. - -2. **Identifying the Cause:** The incorrect behavior was traced to a specific line in QEMU's source code (`sme_helper.c`), where an offset adjustment used `+1` instead of `+8`, leading to improper data alignment and storage. - -3. **Reproducing the Issue:** A test program was provided that demonstrates the bug. When run, it shows that after executing the `ST1Q` instruction, only a portion of the expected bytes are correctly copied from source to destination memory locations. - -4. **Impact Analysis:** This bug affects data integrity when using SME instructions in QEMU, particularly for contiguous store operations involving 128-bit elements. Such errors can lead to silent data corruption or incorrect program behavior in applications relying on these instructions. - -5. **Solution:** The fix involves correcting the offset adjustment from `+1` to `+8`, ensuring that each 128-bit element is stored correctly as 16 bytes, aligning with the expected behavior of the `ST1Q` instruction. - -**Classification: Instruction** - -The bug report revolves around an issue with a specific CPU instruction's implementation within QEMU. Therefore, it falls under the **instruction** category. - -```plaintext -instruction -``` \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1854738 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1854738 deleted file mode 100644 index b0a9b82e..00000000 --- a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1854738 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,11 +0,0 @@ -The bug report discusses issues related to the support for `mttcg` on different PowerPC architectures within QEMU. Specifically, it mentions that `ppc` and `ppc64abi32` do not support `mttcg`, while `ppc64` does. The user is looking to add support for these architectures. - -The provided code snippet shows configuration settings for various PowerPC targets (`ppc`, `ppc64`, `ppc64le`, `ppc64abi32`) and their respective support for `mttcg`. It seems the user wants to ensure that `mttcg` is enabled or correctly handled for these architectures. - -Since the issue revolves around enabling a specific feature (mttcg) for different target architectures, it falls under **runtime** errors. Runtime errors typically involve issues that occur during the execution of the program, such as missing feature support, incorrect configurations, or runtime exceptions. - -Therefore, this bug report should be categorized under: - -**runtime** - -This classification captures the essence of the problem, which is related to the runtime behavior and configuration of QEMU for different PowerPC targets. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1858461 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1858461 deleted file mode 100644 index e28c5d30..00000000 --- a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1858461 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,7 +0,0 @@ -The issue revolves around adding a new system call (syscall) to QEMU for MIPS architecture and encountering an ENOSYS error, indicating that the system call is not recognized. The user attempted to modify `mips_syscall_args` but was unsuccessful because the current implementation in `cpu_loop.c` does not properly handle the new syscall number. - -The problem lies in how syscalls are managed in QEMU's MIPS emulation compared to ARM. While ARM has a structured approach with `ARM_NR_BASE`, MIPS lacks such an organization, leading to the ENOSYS error when the new syscall is called. - -Refactoring the MIPS CPU loop to align with ARM's structure would resolve this issue by ensuring that the new syscall is correctly recognized and handled. This involves updating how syscall numbers are mapped and processed in the MIPS-specific code. - -The categorization of this bug report falls under **syscall**, as it directly pertains to an error related to system calls within QEMU's emulation layer. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1869782 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1869782 deleted file mode 100644 index f0050a20..00000000 --- a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1869782 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,11 +0,0 @@ -The user's issue involves `qemu-arm-static` crashing with a "segmentation fault" when running an `svn checkout` command during a Travis CI build. They've tried reproducing it locally without success and have attempted troubleshooting steps like updating QEMU versions. The problem occurs specifically in the Travis environment, not in an armv7h chroot, leading them to consider removing SVN usage from their scripts. - -The segmentation fault typically indicates an attempt to access memory incorrectly, which could be due to invalid instructions or data accesses. This aligns with runtime issues where the program crashes due to memory management problems rather than specific syscall errors or incorrect instructions in the code. - -Thus, the appropriate category for this bug report is: - -**runtime** - -# Answer - -The given issue falls under the **runtime** category as it relates to a crash during execution, likely due to memory access problems. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1895 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1895 deleted file mode 100644 index 2062b6a1..00000000 --- a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1895 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,7 +0,0 @@ -The bug report describes an issue where `qemu-user` uses a fixed stack size and ignores `RLIMIT_STACK`, leading to segmentation faults when running certain programs like `g++`. This problem is not reproducible on actual hardware, indicating it's specific to the emulation environment provided by `qemu-user`. - -Given that this behavior occurs during runtime execution and isn't directly tied to an incorrect instruction or a syscall error, the most appropriate category for this issue is: - -**runtime** - -This classification captures issues related to the environment in which the code executes, such as resource limitations or constraints imposed by the emulator. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1898954 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1898954 deleted file mode 100644 index b388f888..00000000 --- a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1898954 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,5 +0,0 @@ -The user provided a detailed bug report related to QEMU where executing an `f1` opcode causes issues on Windows but works fine elsewhere. The problem seems to be specific to how QEMU handles certain instructions, particularly the `f1` opcode. - -**Answer: instruction** - -This classification is based on the description pointing towards a faulty or improperly handled CPU instruction (`f1`) within QEMU's emulation layer. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1906193 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1906193 deleted file mode 100644 index 45c535e9..00000000 --- a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1906193 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,13 +0,0 @@ -The issue involves the incorrect return value from `fork()` and `wait()` system calls in a RISC-V 32-bit environment under QEMU emulation. Specifically, when the child process exits with status 42, the parent process receives 40 instead. This discrepancy points to a problem with how exit statuses are handled during system calls. - -The key steps in identifying the category: - -1. **Understanding the Program**: The program uses `fork()` to create a child process which exits with `exit(42)`. The parent waits for the child and checks the exit status using `WEXITSTATUS()`, expecting 42 but receiving 40 instead. - -2. **Symptoms Indicative of System Call Issue**: The incorrect exit status suggests that there's an error in how the exit code is being passed from the child to the parent process. This typically involves system calls like `exit()` and `wait()`. - -3. **Analyzing Possible Causes**: Since the problem occurs during inter-process communication via system calls, it likely relates to how these calls are emulated or handled by QEMU in a RISC-V 32-bit environment. - -4. **Eliminating Other Possibilities**: The issue isn't related to specific instructions misbehaving (so not an instruction category) nor is it a general runtime error outside of system call handling. - -Therefore, the bug is best classified under the **syscall** category because it pertains to errors in system calls used for process management and communication. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1908626 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1908626 deleted file mode 100644 index ab83b68c..00000000 --- a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1908626 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,7 +0,0 @@ -The issue revolves around the use of an atomic test-and-set instruction in the spinlock implementation within PostgreSQL/Greenplum when run under QEMU user emulation for ARM64. The problem does not occur on physical ARM64 hardware but arises specifically within the emulated environment provided by QEMU. This suggests that there is a malfunction or misbehavior in how QEMU handles the specific instruction used for the test-and-set operation, which is crucial for the spinlock functionality. - -The bug report indicates that the spinlock mechanism fails under QEMU, leading to timeouts and PANIC errors. Since this behavior does not manifest on physical hardware, it points towards an issue with how QEMU emulates the instruction rather than a flaw in the instruction itself or the operating system's syscalls. Therefore, the problem is classified as an issue related to an instruction. - -```plaintext -instruction -``` \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1910 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1910 deleted file mode 100644 index 4665dcb2..00000000 --- a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1910 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,14 +0,0 @@ -The issue revolves around a misaligned stack address when handling signals in QEMU for x86_64 userspace. The problem occurs because the signal handler's stack pointer is not properly aligned according to the x86_64 ABI, leading to a crash due to an incorrect `movaps` instruction. - -The key points from the bug report are: - -1. **Problem**: Applications crash in signal handlers due to a misaligned stack address causing a `movaps` instruction to fail. -2. **Symptom**: The crash is reported as a NULL dereference, but GDB shows it's actually caused by a misaligned stack. -3. **Technical Detail**: The x86_64 psABI requires that the stack pointer (`%rsp`) be aligned to a 16-byte boundary when entering a function. However, QEMU's signal handling code does not ensure this alignment when transferring control to the signal handler. -4. **Relevant Code**: The problematic code in `signal.c` adjusts the stack pointer without properly aligning it for x86_64, leading to an unaligned address being used in the signal handler. - -Given that the issue is related to incorrect handling of stack alignment during signal delivery in QEMU's runtime environment, the appropriate category is: - -**runtime** - -This classification fits because the error occurs dynamically during execution (at runtime) and is not directly tied to a specific instruction or system call but rather to how the runtime environment (QEMU) manages the stack for signal handlers. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1915327 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1915327 deleted file mode 100644 index 6ca89558..00000000 --- a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1915327 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,7 +0,0 @@ -The issue revolves around incorrect behavior of the `cmpxchg` instruction in QEMU's TCG (Tiny Code Generator) implementation when compared to real CPU behavior. Specifically, QEMU incorrectly zero-extends the EAX register to RAX after a `cmpxchg` operation, which does not align with how the instruction should behave according to Intel specifications. - -**Category: instruction** - -The problem is clearly tied to an incorrect implementation of a specific x86_64 instruction (`cmpxchg`) within QEMU's TCG. This misbehavior affects both regular and locked versions of the `cmpxchg` instruction, leading to unexpected results in applications that rely on this instruction, such as those developed with BPF (Berkeley Packet Filter). The incorrect zero-extension of EAX to RAX violates the expected semantics defined by Intel's documentation, where the accumulator should remain unchanged if the comparison matches. - -Since this is a problem with how QEMU emulates a specific CPU instruction, it falls under the "instruction" category. This classification helps in directing the bug report to the appropriate part of the codebase and development team within the QEMU project that handles instruction emulation. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1967248 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1967248 deleted file mode 100644 index b66e2947..00000000 --- a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/1967248 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,9 +0,0 @@ -The issue described involves an uncaught target signal 5 (Trace/breakpoint trap) when running a binary under QEMU, but not when using GDB. The user also mentions that QEMU's 32-bit ARM Linux-user mode does not correctly handle BKPT instructions by converting them into SIGTRAP signals. - -**Analysis:** -- The problem revolves around the handling of BKPT (breakpoint) instructions in QEMU. -- Specifically, it appears that QEMU is not properly translating these instructions into the appropriate SIGTRAP signal, which is crucial for debugging purposes. -- This misbehavior leads to a core dump when running the program normally but works as expected under GDB. - -**Classification:** -This issue pertains to how QEMU processes specific ARM instructions (BKPT). Therefore, it falls under the **instruction** category. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/2374 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/2374 deleted file mode 100644 index db22962c..00000000 --- a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/2374 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,20 +0,0 @@ -The issue lies within the implementation of the FMOPA/FMOPS instructions in QEMU's AArch64 TCG helper functions. Specifically, the problem arises from an invalid pointer being used for floating-point status when handling 32-bit operands, leading to incorrect NaN generation. - -Step-by-step explanation: - -1. **Bug Identification**: - - The `sme_fmopa_s` function in `target/arm/tcg/sme_helper.c` is responsible for matrix multiplication and accumulation. - - When performing 32-bit floating-point operations, the function incorrectly uses an invalid pointer (`vst`) instead of a properly initialized local copy (`fpst`) to handle the floating-point status. - -2. **Consequences**: - - This misuse causes NaN results not to be generated as default NaNs but instead retain their non-default form. - - The test case provided demonstrates this by expecting default NaNs (0x0000c07f) but receiving non-default NaNs (0xffffffff). - -3. **Solution**: - - Modify the function to use `&fpst` instead of `vst` when invoking `float32_muladd`. - - This ensures that the correct floating-point status is used, leading to proper default NaN generation. - -4. **Category Classification**: - - The issue pertains directly to an instruction's implementation within QEMU, making it a clear case of an **instruction** bug. - -The problem is classified under the **instruction** category because it involves incorrect behavior in implementing specific CPU instructions (FMOPA/FMOPS) within the QEMU emulator. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/2448 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/2448 deleted file mode 100644 index c1d7d8f6..00000000 --- a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/2448 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,5 +0,0 @@ -The issue revolves around how QEMU's `qemu_getauxval` function handles the `AT_EXECFD` auxiliary vector when its value is zero. Specifically, it incorrectly interprets a valid zero as nonexistent, leading to unexpected behavior where file descriptor 0 remains open and points to the executable. This affects runtime execution, causing programs to read from the executable instead of having standard input closed. - -**Category: runtime** - -The problem arises during runtime execution when QEMU fails to correctly handle the `AT_EXECFD` value, affecting how file descriptors are managed and leading to incorrect behavior in programs that expect certain file descriptor states. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/2495 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/2495 deleted file mode 100644 index 7a4345ab..00000000 --- a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/2495 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,7 +0,0 @@ -The issue pertains to incorrect behavior in translating MMX instructions when REX prefixes are involved. This affects how QEMU generates TCG (Tiny Code Generator) code for such instructions, leading to incorrect execution outcomes. The problem is specific to the handling of certain x86-64 MMX instructions with redundant or varying REX prefixes. - -The correct category for this bug report is: - -**instruction** - -This categorization aligns with the fact that the issue revolves around how QEMU processes specific x86-64 MMX instructions and their corresponding REX prefixes, leading to invalid TCG code generation. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/2553 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/2553 deleted file mode 100644 index 037b118c..00000000 --- a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/2553 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,12 +0,0 @@ -The issue arises from an incorrect structure definition in QEMU's user-mode emulation for PowerPC64, leading to a failed system call when joining IP multicast groups. Specifically, the `imr_ifindex` field in the emulated `struct target_ip_mreqn` is defined as a 64-bit `abi_long`, while it should be a 32-bit integer. This mismatch causes invalid data marshalling during the `setsockopt` call, resulting in an ENODEV error. - -**Steps to reproduce:** - -1. **Compile and run natively on x86_64:** The program works as expected. -2. **Cross-compile for PowerPC64 and emulate with QEMU:** The `setsockopt` call fails with "No such device" due to the incorrect structure marshalling. - -**Analysis:** -The problem lies in how QEMU handles the size and alignment of the `ip_mreqn` structure during emulation. The incorrect definition of `imr_ifindex` as a 64-bit value leads to invalid data being passed to the host's system call, causing the failure. Additionally, QEMU's bounds checking for the option length is too permissive, allowing incorrectly sized structures to be processed without proper validation. - -**Conclusion:** -This is a **syscall** bug because it involves incorrect handling of system calls within QEMU's user-mode emulation layer, specifically related to marshalling data structures used in socket operations. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/2560 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/2560 deleted file mode 100644 index cc6828b2..00000000 --- a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/2560 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,5 +0,0 @@ -The issue described involves problems running Go applications under QEMU's x86_64 emulation on an ARM host. The crash occurs specifically when the garbage collector is active, pointing towards a problem in how memory management or specific system calls are handled within QEMU's runtime environment. - -**Answer: syscall** - -This categorization suggests that the bug is related to system call handling within QEMU. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/306 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/306 deleted file mode 100644 index b8c46fe2..00000000 --- a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/306 +++ /dev/null @@ -1 +0,0 @@ -The classification of this bug report under QEMU would fall into the **syscall** category since it pertains to constraining the `exec()` system call within an emulated environment. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/739785 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/739785 deleted file mode 100644 index fc7c50b9..00000000 --- a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/739785 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,11 +0,0 @@ -The issue described in the bug report revolves around the inability to fork processes in user mode QEMU for i386 on an ARM system. The specific error message "bash: fork: Invalid argument" suggests that there's a problem related to how system calls are being handled, particularly the `fork` system call which is used to create new processes. - -The user has provided detailed steps of their setup and troubleshooting attempts, including compiling QEMU, setting up binfmt_misc, and chrooting into the environment. The problem occurs when they attempt to run commands like `pacman`, indicating a failure in process creation (fork) within the chrooted QEMU environment. - -Given that the error is directly tied to system call functionality (`fork`), it falls under the category of **syscall** issues rather than problems with instructions or general runtime errors. The failed assertion in the dynamic linker further supports this, as it points to underlying issues with how system calls are being emulated or handled within QEMU. - -```json -{ - "category": "syscall" -} -``` \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/829 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/829 deleted file mode 100644 index 80e762b1..00000000 --- a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/manual-review/829 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,18 +0,0 @@ -The issue revolves around how `openat()` interacts with sysroot path translation under user space emulation in QEMU. The problem arises because when using `openat()`, the file descriptor provided is relative to the sysroot directory instead of the expected root directory (`/tmp`), leading to incorrect behavior. - -This is a **syscall** issue because it pertains to how system calls (specifically `openat()`) are being handled and translated by QEMU's user space emulation layer. The problem isn't directly related to faulty CPU instructions or general runtime errors, but rather to the incorrect handling of system call paths in the emulation environment. - -Here’s a concise breakdown: - -1. **Problem**: The `openat()` syscall is not correctly translating paths relative to the provided file descriptor when using sysroot under QEMU's user space emulation. -2. **Category**: Since it involves the behavior and translation of a specific system call (`openat()`), this falls under the **syscall** category. - -Therefore, the appropriate classification for this bug report is: - -```plaintext -syscall -``` - -```plaintext -syscall -``` \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/runtime/1550503 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/runtime/1550503 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..2e52922e --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/runtime/1550503 @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +The issue reported is related to an expression that is always true due to specific bitmasks and defines in the code. This type of bug is typically detected at compile-time or during static analysis rather than causing a runtime error. It falls under the category of code style issues, which are generally flagged by tools like sparse or other static analyzers. + +However, based on the provided categories: + +instruction: Refers to issues with specific instructions (e.g., incorrect opcode handling). +syscall: Pertains to errors in system calls. +runtime: Encompasses other errors that occur during execution. + +The most appropriate category for this issue is **runtime**, as it relates to the behavior of the code during execution, even though it's a static analysis finding. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/runtime/1593 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/runtime/1593 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..c3f980de --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/runtime/1593 @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +The issue here revolves around how QEMU's SLIRP implementation handles network binding when using the `hostfwd` option. The user expects that specifying a particular bind address (like `127.0.0.1`) would limit the listening socket to only that interface. However, due to the use of `INADDR_ANY`, the application ends up binding to all available interfaces (`*.*`), which is not the intended behavior. + +This problem arises from within the code logic of QEMU's SLIRP module, specifically in how it interprets and applies user-provided network settings during runtime. It doesn't pertain to faulty instructions or incorrect system calls but rather to a logical error in the application's handling of configuration parameters. + +**runtime** + +The issue is categorized under "runtime" because it relates to how QEMU executes and handles network configurations during its operation, rather than being an instruction-level fault or a syscall error. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/runtime/1854738 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/runtime/1854738 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..b0a9b82e --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/runtime/1854738 @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +The bug report discusses issues related to the support for `mttcg` on different PowerPC architectures within QEMU. Specifically, it mentions that `ppc` and `ppc64abi32` do not support `mttcg`, while `ppc64` does. The user is looking to add support for these architectures. + +The provided code snippet shows configuration settings for various PowerPC targets (`ppc`, `ppc64`, `ppc64le`, `ppc64abi32`) and their respective support for `mttcg`. It seems the user wants to ensure that `mttcg` is enabled or correctly handled for these architectures. + +Since the issue revolves around enabling a specific feature (mttcg) for different target architectures, it falls under **runtime** errors. Runtime errors typically involve issues that occur during the execution of the program, such as missing feature support, incorrect configurations, or runtime exceptions. + +Therefore, this bug report should be categorized under: + +**runtime** + +This classification captures the essence of the problem, which is related to the runtime behavior and configuration of QEMU for different PowerPC targets. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/runtime/1869782 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/runtime/1869782 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..f0050a20 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/runtime/1869782 @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +The user's issue involves `qemu-arm-static` crashing with a "segmentation fault" when running an `svn checkout` command during a Travis CI build. They've tried reproducing it locally without success and have attempted troubleshooting steps like updating QEMU versions. The problem occurs specifically in the Travis environment, not in an armv7h chroot, leading them to consider removing SVN usage from their scripts. + +The segmentation fault typically indicates an attempt to access memory incorrectly, which could be due to invalid instructions or data accesses. This aligns with runtime issues where the program crashes due to memory management problems rather than specific syscall errors or incorrect instructions in the code. + +Thus, the appropriate category for this bug report is: + +**runtime** + +# Answer + +The given issue falls under the **runtime** category as it relates to a crash during execution, likely due to memory access problems. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/runtime/1895 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/runtime/1895 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..2062b6a1 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/runtime/1895 @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +The bug report describes an issue where `qemu-user` uses a fixed stack size and ignores `RLIMIT_STACK`, leading to segmentation faults when running certain programs like `g++`. This problem is not reproducible on actual hardware, indicating it's specific to the emulation environment provided by `qemu-user`. + +Given that this behavior occurs during runtime execution and isn't directly tied to an incorrect instruction or a syscall error, the most appropriate category for this issue is: + +**runtime** + +This classification captures issues related to the environment in which the code executes, such as resource limitations or constraints imposed by the emulator. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/runtime/1910 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/runtime/1910 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..4665dcb2 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/runtime/1910 @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ +The issue revolves around a misaligned stack address when handling signals in QEMU for x86_64 userspace. The problem occurs because the signal handler's stack pointer is not properly aligned according to the x86_64 ABI, leading to a crash due to an incorrect `movaps` instruction. + +The key points from the bug report are: + +1. **Problem**: Applications crash in signal handlers due to a misaligned stack address causing a `movaps` instruction to fail. +2. **Symptom**: The crash is reported as a NULL dereference, but GDB shows it's actually caused by a misaligned stack. +3. **Technical Detail**: The x86_64 psABI requires that the stack pointer (`%rsp`) be aligned to a 16-byte boundary when entering a function. However, QEMU's signal handling code does not ensure this alignment when transferring control to the signal handler. +4. **Relevant Code**: The problematic code in `signal.c` adjusts the stack pointer without properly aligning it for x86_64, leading to an unaligned address being used in the signal handler. + +Given that the issue is related to incorrect handling of stack alignment during signal delivery in QEMU's runtime environment, the appropriate category is: + +**runtime** + +This classification fits because the error occurs dynamically during execution (at runtime) and is not directly tied to a specific instruction or system call but rather to how the runtime environment (QEMU) manages the stack for signal handlers. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/runtime/2448 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/runtime/2448 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..c1d7d8f6 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/runtime/2448 @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ +The issue revolves around how QEMU's `qemu_getauxval` function handles the `AT_EXECFD` auxiliary vector when its value is zero. Specifically, it incorrectly interprets a valid zero as nonexistent, leading to unexpected behavior where file descriptor 0 remains open and points to the executable. This affects runtime execution, causing programs to read from the executable instead of having standard input closed. + +**Category: runtime** + +The problem arises during runtime execution when QEMU fails to correctly handle the `AT_EXECFD` value, affecting how file descriptors are managed and leading to incorrect behavior in programs that expect certain file descriptor states. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/syscall/1617929 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/syscall/1617929 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..934062a2 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/syscall/1617929 @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ +The issue revolves around the `pselect` system call causing QEMU to hang. The backtrace from GDB and strace log both point to problems occurring during or after executing this system call. The problem is reproducible but not consistently, and it affects stable versions as well. + +**Answer: syscall** + +The bug report indicates a problem with the `pselect` system call within QEMU, leading to hangs during execution. This falls under the `syscall` category since the issue is directly related to how QEMU handles this specific system call. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/syscall/1738545 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/syscall/1738545 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..d16af140 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/syscall/1738545 @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +The issue arises when running a Go binary compiled with `gccgo-7` on QEMU for ARM architecture, specifically when using `qemu-user`. The error message indicates an "mmap errno 9", which corresponds to "Bad file descriptor". This suggests that there's a problem with how system calls related to memory mapping are being handled within QEMU. Since the same binary works fine on real hardware but fails under emulation, it points towards an incompatibility or misimplementation in how QEMU handles certain syscalls. + +Given that the error is tied to `mmap`, which is a system call used for memory management, and considering that this is specific to QEMU's emulation layer, the most appropriate category for this bug would be **syscall**. This categorization aligns with issues related to system calls not functioning as expected within the emulated environment. + +**Step-by-step Explanation:** + +1. **Identify the Error:** The error message "mmap errno 9" signifies that the `mmap` system call is failing with the error code 9, which translates to "Bad file descriptor". + +2. **Understand the Context:** The Go binary works on real hardware but fails when run under QEMU for ARM. This suggests that the issue lies within how QEMU emulates certain system calls. + +3. **Categorize the Bug:** Since the problem is directly related to a system call (`mmap`) not behaving correctly in the emulated environment, it falls under the **syscall** category. + +4. **Conclusion:** The bug report should be classified as a syscall issue because it pertains to the failure of a specific system call within QEMU's emulation layer. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/syscall/1805913 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/syscall/1805913 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..2227f171 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/syscall/1805913 @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +The bug report discusses an issue where readdir() returns NULL with errno=EOVERFLOW when running a 32-bit user-static qemu on a 64-bit host. The root cause is related to how glibc handles inode numbers and offsets, which don't fit into 32-bit ranges when using getdents64() from the 64-bit kernel. This leads to EOVERFLOW as per the C standard's requirements for readdir(). The problem arises in the interaction between the 32-bit environment (qemu) and the underlying 64-bit system calls. + +The issue is classified under "syscall" because it pertains to errors occurring during system calls, specifically how getdents64() handles inode numbers and offsets across different bitness environments. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/syscall/1830 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/syscall/1830 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..e40ef884 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/syscall/1830 @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ +The issue describes a problem where a command hangs and consumes excessive CPU within a CentOS 7 arm64 container running on an Ubuntu 22 AMD64 host. The hanging process is related to the dynamic linker (`ld-2.17.so`), which suggests that it might be stuck in a system call or experiencing issues with process execution. + +Key points: +1. **Command Hanging**: The `LD_DEBUG=all /lib64/ld-2.17.so --list /usr/bin/true` command hangs and takes over the CPU. +2. **Process State**: The process is in state 'R' (Running), indicating it's active but not completing. +3. **Environment Specificity**: This occurs specifically on an AMD64 host running ARM64 containers via QEMU, but not on native ARM64 hardware or Ubuntu 20.04 hosts. + +Given that the problem is environment-specific and involves process execution in a cross-architecture setup using QEMU, it likely relates to how system calls are handled in the emulation layer. This points towards issues with system call translation or handling within QEMU. + +Therefore, the most appropriate category for this bug report is: + +**syscall** + +This categorization suggests that the issue lies in how system calls are being managed or translated by QEMU when running ARM64 binaries on an AMD64 host. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/syscall/1858461 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/syscall/1858461 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..e28c5d30 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/syscall/1858461 @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +The issue revolves around adding a new system call (syscall) to QEMU for MIPS architecture and encountering an ENOSYS error, indicating that the system call is not recognized. The user attempted to modify `mips_syscall_args` but was unsuccessful because the current implementation in `cpu_loop.c` does not properly handle the new syscall number. + +The problem lies in how syscalls are managed in QEMU's MIPS emulation compared to ARM. While ARM has a structured approach with `ARM_NR_BASE`, MIPS lacks such an organization, leading to the ENOSYS error when the new syscall is called. + +Refactoring the MIPS CPU loop to align with ARM's structure would resolve this issue by ensuring that the new syscall is correctly recognized and handled. This involves updating how syscall numbers are mapped and processed in the MIPS-specific code. + +The categorization of this bug report falls under **syscall**, as it directly pertains to an error related to system calls within QEMU's emulation layer. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/syscall/1906193 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/syscall/1906193 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..45c535e9 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/syscall/1906193 @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +The issue involves the incorrect return value from `fork()` and `wait()` system calls in a RISC-V 32-bit environment under QEMU emulation. Specifically, when the child process exits with status 42, the parent process receives 40 instead. This discrepancy points to a problem with how exit statuses are handled during system calls. + +The key steps in identifying the category: + +1. **Understanding the Program**: The program uses `fork()` to create a child process which exits with `exit(42)`. The parent waits for the child and checks the exit status using `WEXITSTATUS()`, expecting 42 but receiving 40 instead. + +2. **Symptoms Indicative of System Call Issue**: The incorrect exit status suggests that there's an error in how the exit code is being passed from the child to the parent process. This typically involves system calls like `exit()` and `wait()`. + +3. **Analyzing Possible Causes**: Since the problem occurs during inter-process communication via system calls, it likely relates to how these calls are emulated or handled by QEMU in a RISC-V 32-bit environment. + +4. **Eliminating Other Possibilities**: The issue isn't related to specific instructions misbehaving (so not an instruction category) nor is it a general runtime error outside of system call handling. + +Therefore, the bug is best classified under the **syscall** category because it pertains to errors in system calls used for process management and communication. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/syscall/2553 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/syscall/2553 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..037b118c --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/syscall/2553 @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ +The issue arises from an incorrect structure definition in QEMU's user-mode emulation for PowerPC64, leading to a failed system call when joining IP multicast groups. Specifically, the `imr_ifindex` field in the emulated `struct target_ip_mreqn` is defined as a 64-bit `abi_long`, while it should be a 32-bit integer. This mismatch causes invalid data marshalling during the `setsockopt` call, resulting in an ENODEV error. + +**Steps to reproduce:** + +1. **Compile and run natively on x86_64:** The program works as expected. +2. **Cross-compile for PowerPC64 and emulate with QEMU:** The `setsockopt` call fails with "No such device" due to the incorrect structure marshalling. + +**Analysis:** +The problem lies in how QEMU handles the size and alignment of the `ip_mreqn` structure during emulation. The incorrect definition of `imr_ifindex` as a 64-bit value leads to invalid data being passed to the host's system call, causing the failure. Additionally, QEMU's bounds checking for the option length is too permissive, allowing incorrectly sized structures to be processed without proper validation. + +**Conclusion:** +This is a **syscall** bug because it involves incorrect handling of system calls within QEMU's user-mode emulation layer, specifically related to marshalling data structures used in socket operations. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/syscall/2560 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/syscall/2560 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..cc6828b2 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/syscall/2560 @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ +The issue described involves problems running Go applications under QEMU's x86_64 emulation on an ARM host. The crash occurs specifically when the garbage collector is active, pointing towards a problem in how memory management or specific system calls are handled within QEMU's runtime environment. + +**Answer: syscall** + +This categorization suggests that the bug is related to system call handling within QEMU. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/syscall/306 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/syscall/306 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..b8c46fe2 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/syscall/306 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +The classification of this bug report under QEMU would fall into the **syscall** category since it pertains to constraining the `exec()` system call within an emulated environment. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/syscall/739785 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/syscall/739785 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..fc7c50b9 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/syscall/739785 @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +The issue described in the bug report revolves around the inability to fork processes in user mode QEMU for i386 on an ARM system. The specific error message "bash: fork: Invalid argument" suggests that there's a problem related to how system calls are being handled, particularly the `fork` system call which is used to create new processes. + +The user has provided detailed steps of their setup and troubleshooting attempts, including compiling QEMU, setting up binfmt_misc, and chrooting into the environment. The problem occurs when they attempt to run commands like `pacman`, indicating a failure in process creation (fork) within the chrooted QEMU environment. + +Given that the error is directly tied to system call functionality (`fork`), it falls under the category of **syscall** issues rather than problems with instructions or general runtime errors. The failed assertion in the dynamic linker further supports this, as it points to underlying issues with how system calls are being emulated or handled within QEMU. + +```json +{ + "category": "syscall" +} +``` \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/syscall/829 b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/syscall/829 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..80e762b1 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/no-thinking-deepseek-r1:70b/reasoning/syscall/829 @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +The issue revolves around how `openat()` interacts with sysroot path translation under user space emulation in QEMU. The problem arises because when using `openat()`, the file descriptor provided is relative to the sysroot directory instead of the expected root directory (`/tmp`), leading to incorrect behavior. + +This is a **syscall** issue because it pertains to how system calls (specifically `openat()`) are being handled and translated by QEMU's user space emulation layer. The problem isn't directly related to faulty CPU instructions or general runtime errors, but rather to the incorrect handling of system call paths in the emulation environment. + +Here’s a concise breakdown: + +1. **Problem**: The `openat()` syscall is not correctly translating paths relative to the provided file descriptor when using sysroot under QEMU's user space emulation. +2. **Category**: Since it involves the behavior and translation of a specific system call (`openat()`), this falls under the **syscall** category. + +Therefore, the appropriate classification for this bug report is: + +```plaintext +syscall +``` + +```plaintext +syscall +``` \ No newline at end of file -- cgit 1.4.1