From 25f8033d556aa17afaea4a5196ea7a69fe248320 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christian Krinitsin Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2025 12:34:26 +0000 Subject: add new temporary deepseek-r1:14b results --- .../classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/1182490 | 13 +++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) create mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/1182490 (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/1182490') diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/1182490 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/1182490 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..9083aa42 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/1182490 @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ + +Okay, let's try to figure out the category for this bug report. The user provided a detailed backtrace and some code context from QEMU. + +Looking at the error message: "coroutine-win32.c broken on NULL pointer". It seems like there's a null pointer dereference happening somewhere in the coroutine handling code. + +The function `qemu_coroutine_switch` is being called with `to_=0x0`, which is null. In the source file, line 47 of coroutine-win32.c, it tries to access `to->action = action;`. Since `to` is null, this causes a segmentation fault. + +So the bug is related to improper handling of coroutines on Windows. Coroutines are part of QEMU's execution model, especially for things like device emulation and I/O operations. This isn't about translation between architectures or assembly lowering. It seems more like an issue with how coroutines are managed in the Win32 environment. + +The categories given include 'device', 'hypervisor', 'peripherals', etc. Since coroutines relate to concurrency and scheduling within QEMU, which is part of the hypervisor's responsibilities when running virtual machines, I'd categorize this under 'hypervisor'. + + +hypervisor \ No newline at end of file -- cgit 1.4.1