From 25f8033d556aa17afaea4a5196ea7a69fe248320 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christian Krinitsin Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2025 12:34:26 +0000 Subject: add new temporary deepseek-r1:14b results --- .../classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/1303926 | 11 +++++++++++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) create mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/1303926 (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/1303926') diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/1303926 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/1303926 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..002b6516 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/1303926 @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ + +Okay, I need to classify this bug report for QEMU. The user mentioned that qemu-system-x86_64 crashed with SIGABRT after upgrading to version 2.0 in trusty. Looking at the categories provided, I see options like 'mistranslation', 'assembly', and others related to specific components. + +The crash is a segmentation fault (SIGABRT), which usually indicates a runtime error, possibly due to invalid memory access or an assertion failure. Since it's happening with QEMU, which is a hypervisor, the issue might be in how virtualization is handled. + +I don't see any clues pointing towards assembly issues or incorrect translations. The crash seems more related to system-level components rather than user-mode problems. Considering the options, 'hypervisor' fits because QEMU functions as one, and such crashes are common in hypervisors due to complex interactions with hardware or virtual machines. + +Other categories like network or device don't seem relevant here since the report doesn't mention those areas. The crash is more about the core functionality of QEMU's hypervisor role. + + +hypervisor \ No newline at end of file -- cgit 1.4.1