From 25f8033d556aa17afaea4a5196ea7a69fe248320 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christian Krinitsin Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2025 12:34:26 +0000 Subject: add new temporary deepseek-r1:14b results --- results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/139 | 13 +++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) create mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/139 (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/139') diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/139 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/139 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..5504c1b2 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/139 @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ + +Okay, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories for QEMU. The bug mentions that the KVM RBD driver doesn't report the DISCARD-ZERO flag, and it also mentions other formats like qcow2 and qed. + +First, I'll look at the list of categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +The report is specifically about the KVM driver not handling a certain flag correctly. Since it's related to KVM drivers and storage (RBD, qcow2), this seems to be a problem with how the hypervisor interacts with block devices or storage backends. + +Looking at the categories, "hypervisor" fits because KVM is the hypervisor component in QEMU. Alternatively, "device" could also be considered since it's about device drivers (storage). However, the primary issue here is likely related to the hypervisor's handling of these storage formats and their flags. + +So, the most appropriate category would be "hypervisor". + + +hypervisor \ No newline at end of file -- cgit v1.2.3