From 25f8033d556aa17afaea4a5196ea7a69fe248320 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christian Krinitsin Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2025 12:34:26 +0000 Subject: add new temporary deepseek-r1:14b results --- .../classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/1908781 | 13 +++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) create mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/1908781 (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/1908781') diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/1908781 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/1908781 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..6a301f58 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/1908781 @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ + +Alright, I need to classify the given bug report into one of the provided categories. The report is about an issue with QEMU where a specific fault isn't being handled correctly when certain bits in the code segment descriptor are set. + +The user mentioned that when running under KVM, a GP fault occurs as expected, but without acceleration (so using a different hypervisor or interpreter), no fault happens. This indicates a problem related to how QEMU handles virtualization modes or specific instructions when not using KVM. + +Looking at the categories: The issue seems related to x86-64 segmentation and exception handling. Since it's about the behavior under KVM versus without, and given that KVM is part of the hypervisor category, I should consider whether this falls under 'hypervisor' or another area like 'kernel' or 'peripherals'. + +However, since the problem specifically relates to how QEMU handles certain segment descriptors when running with or without acceleration (KVM), it's more about the virtualization layer. Therefore, the appropriate category is 'hypervisor'. + + +The bug report discusses an issue where a specific fault occurs under KVM but not otherwise, which points towards a hypervisor-related problem. + +hypervisor \ No newline at end of file -- cgit v1.2.3