From d0c85e36e4de67af628d54e9ab577cc3fad7796a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christian Krinitsin Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2025 07:27:52 +0000 Subject: add deepseek and gemma results --- results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/hypervisor/233 | 15 +++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+) create mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/hypervisor/233 (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/hypervisor/233') diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/hypervisor/233 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/hypervisor/233 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..286c7b19 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/hypervisor/233 @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ + +Okay, so I have this bug report: "QEMU installer with WHPX support". I need to classify it into one of the given categories. + +First, let me look at the list of possible categories again: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +The term "QEMU installer" suggests it's about the installation process or setup of QEMU. WHPX—I'm not sure what that stands for. Maybe I should look it up quickly. Oh, WHPX is part of Microsoft's Windows Hypervisor Platform, which allows running VMs on Windows without Hyper-V. + +So the bug is related to adding support for WHPX in the QEMU installer. Since QEMU is a hypervisor itself, supporting another hypervisor platform might be about integrating or configuring the hypervisor components. + +Looking at the categories, "hypervisor" seems the most fitting because it's directly related to how QEMU interacts with or supports hypervisor technologies like WHPX. + +Other possibilities: Could it be under 'KVM'? No, KVM is another hypervisor but this is about WHPX. Maybe 'other', but I think 'hypervisor' is more precise. + + +hypervisor \ No newline at end of file -- cgit v1.2.3