From dee4dcba78baf712cab403d47d9db319ab7f95d6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christian Krinitsin Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2025 19:39:53 +0200 Subject: restructure results --- .../classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/hypervisor/1344 | 15 +++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+) create mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/hypervisor/1344 (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/hypervisor/1344') diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/hypervisor/1344 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/hypervisor/1344 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..be36e094 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/hypervisor/1344 @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ + +Alright, I'm trying to classify this bug report where someone is encountering a "KVM internal error" when using a custom kernel in QEMU. The suberror mentioned is number 4. + +First, I recall that the possible categories include things like 'mistranslation', 'assembly', and others related to specific components like 'network', 'graphic', or 'hypervisor'. Since the report mentions KVM specifically, which stands for Kernel-based Virtual Machine, it's a hypervisor component. Therefore, any issue with KVM would fall under that category. + +I don't think it's a mistranslation because that relates more to code generation issues in user-mode. It's also not directly about assembly or other lower-level components unless the problem is in the hypervisor layer itself. + +Given that the error occurs when using a custom kernel, which interacts closely with the hypervisor (KVM) for virtualization tasks, it makes sense that this would be classified under 'hypervisor'. + +So, considering all this, the appropriate category should be 'hypervisor'. + + +The bug report involves an issue with KVM, specifically mentioning a "custom kernel" and an internal error. Since KVM is a hypervisor component, the classification falls under 'hypervisor'. + +**hypervisor** \ No newline at end of file -- cgit 1.4.1