From dee4dcba78baf712cab403d47d9db319ab7f95d6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christian Krinitsin Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2025 19:39:53 +0200 Subject: restructure results --- .../classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/hypervisor/1549298 | 11 +++++++++++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) create mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/hypervisor/1549298 (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/hypervisor/1549298') diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/hypervisor/1549298 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/hypervisor/1549298 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..9fd26caf --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/hypervisor/1549298 @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ + +Alright, let's try to figure out how to classify this bug report. The user mentioned that when running powertop, it crashes because QEMU doesn't emulate certain MSRs (Model Specific Registers). So the issue is about missing hardware features in the emulator. + +Looking at the categories provided: device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. I need to find which one fits best. + +MSRs are typically related to CPU-specific functions. Since QEMU is a hypervisor that emulates hardware, adding missing MSRs would fall under enhancing the CPU or hardware emulation part. The category 'hypervisor' seems appropriate because it's about how QEMU emulates the underlying hardware, including features like MSRs which are CPU-related. + +Alternatively, 'kernel' might come to mind, but since this is about hardware emulation in a hypervisor context, 'hypervisor' feels more precise. It's about improving QEMU's ability to emulate specific CPU registers that applications like powertop rely on. + + +hypervisor \ No newline at end of file -- cgit 1.4.1