From dee4dcba78baf712cab403d47d9db319ab7f95d6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christian Krinitsin Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2025 19:39:53 +0200 Subject: restructure results --- results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/hypervisor/699 | 13 +++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) create mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/hypervisor/699 (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/hypervisor/699') diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/hypervisor/699 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/hypervisor/699 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..58d543f5 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/hypervisor/699 @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ + +Okay, I need to classify this bug report about "SGX QEMU release." Let me think through this step by step. + +First, I see that it's related to QEMU, which is an emulator and a hypervisor. Hypervisors are software or hardware components that allow multiple operating systems to run on the same physical machine. So, when I look at the possible categories provided, "hypervisor" stands out as a likely candidate because QEMU functions in that role. + +Next, considering other options: "mistranslation," "assembly lowering," and "user-mode" all relate more to how code is translated or executed within user space, which doesn't directly apply here since the bug report is about SGX release. "SGX" refers to Intel's Software Guard Extensions, which are part of the CPU for security purposes, but in this context, it's tied to QEMU. + +Looking at other categories like "device," "graphic," "socket," etc., they don't seem relevant here either. The mention of "hypervisor" in the possible categories aligns well with QEMU's primary function, which is emulating hardware and acting as a hypervisor for virtual machines. + +So, putting it all together, the bug report is likely related to how QEMU handles hypervisor functions, making "hypervisor" the most appropriate category. + + +hypervisor \ No newline at end of file -- cgit 1.4.1