From 238ec2b7cc1557d6f34c33cc482e4d0cd3e266dd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christian Krinitsin Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2025 16:43:19 +0000 Subject: add results --- .../classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/2317 | 13 +++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) create mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/2317 (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/2317') diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/2317 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/2317 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..814f8991 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/2317 @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ + +Okay, so I'm trying to figure out what category this bug falls into for QEMU. The problem is about an instruction not being emulated correctly—the ADDV opcode. + +Looking at the description, the user says that according to the documentation, ADDV Rm, Rn should add Rm and Rn, store the result in Rn, and set the overflow flag T. But in QEMU, it's storing the result in Rm instead of Rn. That means the instruction is being handled incorrectly. + +The steps to reproduce involve a C program that uses inline assembly with ADDV. The real hardware gives different results than QEMU when this instruction is used. So, the issue isn't with a system call or something happening during runtime; it's specifically about how an instruction is emulated in QEMU. + +So, I think the category should be 'instruction' because it's directly related to how a specific CPU instruction is handled. + + +The bug report describes an issue where the ADDV instruction is not being emulated correctly by QEMU. The problem lies in the handling of this specific instruction, which falls under the 'instruction' category. + +instruction \ No newline at end of file -- cgit v1.2.3